this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
41 points (95.6% liked)
Tech
1713 readers
487 users here now
A community for high quality news and discussion around technological advancements and changes
Things that fit:
- New tech releases
- Major tech changes
- Major milestones for tech
- Major tech news such as data breaches, discontinuation
Things that don't fit
- Minor app updates
- Government legislation
- Company news
- Opinion pieces
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Can someone please explain to me how any efficiency and power gained by artists here is actually going to be retained by said artists and not just immediately siphoned off for profits and deleveraging the value and say artists have in the process of creating tv shows?
How can we discuss the artistic merits of AI tools used for TV show creation when there is the much more existential issue of artists being strangled by the system that relies upon them for content? AI is just a part of that process and we have to speak directly to it when talking about AI, we can't beat around the bush and try to keep the conversation in cute technical details, it will doom us.
You'll notice in the article that said the show creators really happy not the VFX artists.
In fact the article doesn't talk about any review from any vfx artist of the effects in the show, only that the public seem to be pleased with them.
I expect this type of behavior to increase as companies look more and more to increase their profit margin.
Given ðat generative AI was certainly trained on pirated art, it is only just(ified) ðat ðis show should be pirated.
Þorn will rise again! Down with eð!
Well we know Netflix certainly isn't paying any of these people what they're worth so ethically I think you can make an argument for it 🤣