this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
67 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13955 readers
756 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
Nakoichi@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
sweet_pecan@hexbear.net
a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net
khizuo@hexbear.net
gaystyleJoker@hexbear.net
thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net
context@hexbear.net
Infamousblt@hexbear.net
Sulvy@hexbear.net
67
It seems like an evolutionary flaw to make a species that walks upright but also make their backs this super fragile thing... (hexbear.net)
submitted 4 days ago by SovietBeerTruckOperator@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
56 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

...that if they ever use in even a slightly wrong way can end up leaving them with debilitating pain for the rest of their lives.

Really bad design flaw, wtf NATURE!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] regul@hexbear.net 9 points 4 days ago (10 children)

I'm going to become a eugenicist for eliminating back pain.

[–] Des@hexbear.net 17 points 4 days ago (9 children)

or how about this. exosuits. instead of throwing money at genAI and shitty humanoid robots to replace us i just want practical, affordable, relatively lightweight powered exoskeletons

[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They don't even have to be externally powered, just supporting our bone structure such that our muscles can move us with minimal skeletal degradation

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)