377
submitted 9 months ago by deconstruct@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world

A Wyoming ranch accused of abusing children and forcing them to perform manual labor lost its license earlier this year after state officials documented a litany of safety and sanitary violations. But the ranch found a way to stay open and will no longer need a license to care for children, a development that has alarmed youth rights advocates.

The Wyoming Department of Family Services in June revoked the group home license from Triangle Cross Ranch, a facility that claims it can help transform teenage boys from misbehaving rebels into “thoughtful, respectful, and responsible young men” for a $5,800 monthly fee.

The facility, which typically has five or fewer boys enrolled at a time, will now operate without a license because the owner said last month he was appointed guardian of the youth living there, a department spokesman said. The spokesman said the owner provided copies of the paperwork, which was filed in Wyoming.

And state officials will no longer conduct regular welfare inspections going forward due to another licensing exemption for ranches or farms that do not offer services to children who are homeless, delinquent or have an intellectual disability, according to the department’s rules.

“It’s incredibly troubling that they would have decided to go this route after losing their license to be a child caring facility,” said Donna Sheen, founder and director of the Wyoming Children’s Law Center, a nonprofit. She noted that the Department of Family Services will now need a specific allegation or complaint in order to investigate the ranch.

An NBC News investigation last year found that the ranch and Trinity Teen Solutions, a facility for girls run by the same family, had operated in rural Wyoming for years despite repeated complaints from youth of cruel and humiliating treatment. State inspectors documented numerous red flags at Triangle Cross Ranch, including misrepresenting its services, punishing boys for speaking with state officials and complaining about their treatment, and making children physically restrain each other.

Andrew Scavuzzo, who sued Triangle Cross Ranch over abuse he alleged took place at the ranch in 2012, said he’d been branded with a hot iron when he was a boy at the facility. He said he also had to haul dead animal carcasses, was forced by staff to huff gasoline and that boys had to box each other as punishment.

In April, a department official observed broken windows, and doors and lights that did not work during an inspection of the ranch. There was also a dead calf that had been lying in the yard for three days and the inspector witnessed a dog eating it. Youth were left alone while a staff member napped, inspection files show. Officials also noted that weapons, such as a large knife, and tobacco products were left lying unattended at the ranch.

The state found that one boy had to be taken to a hospital for self-harming after the ranch failed to give him his medication for 26 days. The ranch refused to take the boy back because he was too high risk, so he was sent to another group home, records show.

Inspectors found that Schneider, the ranch owner, had also moved the children to Montana earlier this year to hide them from state officials.

At the last inspection of the ranch in July, the state found additional violations, including an adult living in the children’s bunk house, lack of background checks, and one of two youth residing there without any bedding. Again, there was feces on the floor.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] deconstruct@lemm.ee 78 points 9 months ago

Instead of sending multiple people to jail for abusing kids, officials will turn a blind eye to abuse it knows will happen.

Abuse is normalized in the "troubled teen" industry and it's absolutely infuriating.

[-] chaogomu@kbin.social 39 points 9 months ago

It's more that the republicans in the statehouse have limited the power of state agencies to protect kids, because conservatives see children as property, not people.

So the state agencies are screaming to the heavens about this shit, and are barred from acting due to laws that they must obey or else they can't help any kids.

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

According to the article, the owner has been granted custody of the children so there's no license for child care is required. It doesn't mean that agencies like CPS can't intervene, though.

[-] TruTollTroll@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago

That means the parents were complicit and gave(signed) away their parental rights away.. how fucking heinous

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

Parents probably got tired of fucking them, or they aged out and only wanted toddlers. Whatever the case, when I see a Republican on the street—I usually think they’ve probably fucked a kid.

[-] joel_feila@lemmy.world -4 points 9 months ago

Yeah and its not any better in cps.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Because you think they take too many kids or because you think they don't remove enough kids from bad situations?

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago

As someone who went through the system for a bit, my personal issue is that theyre a bunch of fuck ups. One foster parent didnt speak much english (she was nice enough but I couldnt really communicate), one just didnt like me and just derided me a lot, third ones were nice, and the last one let her snot nosed grandkids break my shit.

On top of that they kept trying to put me with my father who sexually, physically, emotionally, and verbally abused me. Then they put me with my mom who only emotionally, verbally, and physically abused me. Lucky me the judge eventually put me with my grandmother who fucking hates my father and thinks my mother is a grade a fuckup.

And on top of all that im Autistic, so im just a bundle of mental health issues even 14 years after it all ended.

So yeah theres a fuckton not to like abput CPS, mess needs a massive reform. And before anyone assumes that this may just be red state BS im from southern California.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Sure, but how much of that is your family and just the world and how much of it is CPS? There's a reason they're extremely reluctant to permanently remove kids from their parents.

Does it need reform or resources? Not a lot of people out there looking to home 9-14 year olds who likely have behavioral problems.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago

It needs both reform and resources plus oversight boards. Theres no reason they shouldve been pushing me with my father given that I was more or less raised exclusively with my mothers family by that point, and everytime I was away from people trying to make me like him id default back to bloodthirst.

Admitedly my situation was extra fucked guven the fact that a family friend who was a deputy at the time asked around and became convined that my father was friends with a one of the local CPS higher ups.

[-] pozbo@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

So they either risk it in the system or stay where they are being abused.

I can confidently say the risk is worth avoiding a known abuser.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Most certainly, even with all the fuck ups being in the system was a notable improvement for me. The problem was that they kept trying to put me with my father and were highly resistent to giving me to my maternal grandmother. To the point that my case worker said in court " you will never get that child". The point is that the system needs heavy reform, increased funding, and more direct oversight.

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
377 points (98.7% liked)

News

21693 readers
4440 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS