this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
109 points (87.1% liked)

Technology

34967 readers
249 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheRealCharlesEames@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Tough to go from free to $10/month without any obvious to me improvements, as much as I’d like to support the cause

[–] ram@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Totally valid. For me the killer feature is being able to change the weights for various sites, making it so websites with content that's not useful to me or I don't like don't appear^[e.g. apple.com, facebook, nypost, quora], pinning websites that I consider best-of-class for their relevant searches^[e.g. wikipedia, the ffxiv wiki], and prioritizing websites I do like, but aren't always the best answer^[e.g. opencritic, speedrun.com, cbc, w3schools, github].

They also have a "Lenses" feature that lets you make your own search lens (like I have one for Lemmy-only results), but I've not really had much use for those.

[–] goji@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The regex redirect feature is another massive pro. I hope they bring it into Orion as well.

I already use Stop the Madness for this, and probably will continue to as it’s a more global solution, but having it built right into the search engine at least shows they’re taking real steps to hand control back to the user.

[–] ram@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Oh ya I use that as well, to turn Youtube results into Invidious, reddit into web.archive.org/save/, twitter into nitter, tiktok into proxitok, and AMP results into normal articles. It's nice because, since I use kagi on my phone, it reaches where extensions don't normally.

[–] shasta@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure there are browser extensions that already do this for you on Google. You can do it manually on each search but that's obviously cumbersome. But browser extensions are basically what you're describing and still free

[–] ram@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's literally not. For blocking, sure, but not changing the behaviours of your search algorithm.

[–] shasta@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh so I'm just imagining this? https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ublacklist/pncfbmialoiaghdehhbnbhkkgmjanfhe

It literally lets you construct a blacklist so those sites don't show up in future search results.

This one has been around for over 5 years.

[–] ram@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Blocks sites you specify from appearing in Google search results

I wonder if you even read my comment? Also chill, there's no need to condescend over a search engine lmao.

[–] shasta@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah you're right. I only read up to the part about blocking sites and got excited to share my knowledge. Sorry.

[–] ram@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I appreciate the apology ♥

[–] Linssiili@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago

Have you tried it? At least for me, I often get better results compared to google. Also Kagi has a free trial of 100 searches.

Granted I'm a developer, so my job is basically just searching for information, so getting better results is really valuable for me.

[–] narwhal@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

There's the 5$/month option available if you don't search more than 300 times a month.

[–] priapus@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

It has a free trial. If you don't see the improvements, don't pay.

[–] ink@r.nf -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's cheaper to just run SearXNG instance. People claiming any new search engine is better than established ones are hallucinating with their anecdotes.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How easy is it for an average Joe to set up their own SearXNG instance?

[–] drwho@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

It appears a bit more difficult than setting up the original Searx. I've been poking around in the code for SearXNG lately because I'm planning on migrating to it but haven't done any serious work with it yet.