this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
401 points (73.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

9663 readers
64 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] YashaB@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There's no alternative to a working public transport. Period.

Ok bikes. 😁

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Bikes don't work well in places like where I live when you can easily get 1-2 feet of snow in the winter. Or very icy roads. They definitely should be used more, but they aren't a panacea.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some nations that experience harsh winters have well maintained bicycle infrastructure year round. Access to effecient, maintained, and safe bicycle infrastructure is the biggest factor preventing or enabling cycling.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Biking in sub-zero temperatures when it isn't even safe to be exposed outside for more than a few minutes (also happens here in the winter) is not a good idea either.

Again, I am all about bikes. I think bikes should be widely adopted. I would also never ride one in winter conditions here no matter how well the infrastructure is maintained. Have you ever seen a road plowed after there's been a huge snowfall? Keeping a bike lane clear is not especially reasonable an expectation for a snowplow.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (7 children)

https://youtu.be/Uhx-26GfCBU?si=xm6kjWjVBJnN-iz_

Most bike lanes get a differnet treatment creating a tightly packed snow surface to pedal on.

Safe bicycle infrastructure does not equal bicycle gutters. Bicycle gutters are unsafe on most roads even in the summer and were designed without winter maintaince as a consideration.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Biking in sub-zero temperatures when it isn’t even safe to be exposed outside for more than a few minutes (also happens here in the winter) is not a good idea either.

It's funny how many of the same people making this sort of argument would happily go skiing in the exact same weather.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I sure as hell wouldn't go skiing when it's -30 and they say it's unsafe to be outside.

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

This is just conjecture.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My family lives in a rural town of 1600, my wife works 800m from home and I commute 50km to the nearest city for work. Most days she walks to work for 7:30 or takes the ebike. I take our EV to arrive at 9am. My daughter takes the school bus , which arrives at my home at 8:17am.

There is a bus that comes to my town and goes to the city each day at 7AM and 8AM. Unfortunately, I cannot take the bus, or I would have to leave my daughter unattended. I don't think I need to explain why taking my bike 120km a day round trip by the bike path won't work.

By taking the EV, I make my life work and I save a good amount of CO2 in the process. My old hatchback would have burned 7.7l fuel to make the commute , or 7.7 * 19.6 lbs CO2 = 150lb CO2 per day. My EV gets 16kwh/100km generating between 3/4 lb and 5lb CO2 for the trip, based on local energy mix.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I think a mixture is the real solution. Public transport and human-powered transport such as bicycles should be encouraged as much as possible, but they cannot apply to every scenario. I have to drive about 10 miles down a 4-lane highway to an industrial park whose only access is that highway. Both my home and that industrial park are outside city limits. The nearest bus to me is 2 miles away and goes the opposite direction. Even with robust public transport in this area, it wouldn't be economically justifiable to get a bus to go from anywhere near my semi-rural subdivision to that industrial park. Not enough people would ride that bus and it wouldn't be safe to ride a bicycle there.

So I'm a case where I have to drive a car. I don't like it. I wish I had another option. I would never drive again if I could, but right now I drive a car and the most eco-friendly car I could afford, which was a used Prius.

So people in this community can berate me if they want, but I'm pretty much out of options unless I do something drastic like quit my job and move. And "quit your job and move so you don't need a car anymore" is not advice anyone should take. Maybe one day, I will be able to do that. I rode public transport all the time when I lived by the train in L.A. and I loved it. But I don't live in L.A. anymore, I live in a small city in Indiana where public transport throughout the county, which is mostly farms outside city limits, is just not viable.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Your situation doesn't reflect the majority's situation, that's what people need to understand, with better public transport it's a very small minority that needs a car.

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I do understand that. But this meme doesn't understand me.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In a way it does, if cars didn't exist you would have found work closer to home and your environmental impact would be lower. Your situation exist because cars allow it to.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sky@codesink.io 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good thing memes don't have to account for every individuals experience in the world huh

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The meme makes a blanket statement forgetting about a big swath of rural people, falsely claiming that EVs don't address climate change when the cold fact is that EVs do represent a way for people like me to contribute to the solution. A meme like this deserves a reminder like mine.

[–] sky@codesink.io 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or you could simply remember that it's just a meme and stop getting so worked up!

Signed, A rural EV owner

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Or, I could make a small post so that one of our rural neighbours, driving an SUV, doesn't read "EVs don't solve climate change" and think to themselves "Hey, that's true, may as well continue on with my SUV".

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Your situation doesn’t reflect the majority’s situation

In America this is an extremely common situation. Public transit is abysmal here. We need to build that up before we start removing car infrastructure.

[–] Ganbat@lemmyonline.com 6 points 1 year ago

They also don't work well in places like I live, where we reach 120°F for about one to one-and-a-half months of the year.

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Neither do cars work well in those conditions.
If you clear and salt the bike paths in a timely manner, like we also expect for other roads, then bikes are a perfectly viable option even in winter.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Weird, because mine works just fine. Also, salt is incredibly ecologically damaging. Never use salt because roads are snowy or icy.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Car work a lot better than bikes in the snow lol

Twice as many wheels probably means more traction, eh? I can quite safely drive through 20cm of fresh snow. Good luck biking in that.

[–] ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi 3 points 1 year ago (21 children)

We've invented means to clear roads of snow, that's how we manage to make cars go on them during winter

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oslo, Norway, is a great cycling city and all the kids ride their bikes to school in the winter. In Norway.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Bikes don’t work well in places like where I live when you can easily get 1-2 feet of snow in the winter.

Neither do cars, unless the streets are plowed. And guess what could be done to bike lanes too, if the government in question gave a shit?

Hilly areas, long-distances, accessibility, there are many reasons for passenger rail.

load more comments (1 replies)