this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
527 points (87.1% liked)

World News

39367 readers
2411 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sugartits@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is entirely separate of course from the much more basic issue that a car that breaks because of some fucking precipitation is not fit for purpose and this damage report would be indefensible just about anywhere in the world.

Two things here...

The source of this is ...The Mirror. Not exactly top shelf journalism. They thrive of outage, just like the Daily Fail. Keep that in mind when reading these trash sources.

I suspect the owner of the vehicle did a lot more than "drive it in a bit of rain" and is simply lying about it in order to try and get bailed out. Funnily enough I've not seen a queue of Tesla's broken down every time I drive in the rain.

It's certainly possible that the owner is telling the truth. But I doubt it. I doubt it a lot.

[–] sizzler@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've recovered Teslas that have "failed" in the rain. It means a moisture sensor has triggered. The car tells you they it can get to where you need to go but then will need to be serviced. It's a "first" generation problem rather than anything inherently wrong with electric cars.

[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It means a moisture sensor has triggered.

Moisture sensors don't typically cost $21k. They said the batteries were full of water.

[–] sizzler@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

They said the batteries were full of water

I think we can assume the moisture sensor was triggered then.

[–] Heggico@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Which is the part I don't really understand. Aren't these batteries pretty much all watercooled? Maybe the control electronics got wet causing it to keep the battery on in a flooded condition and thus draining them completely? Maybe just the moisture senser tripped, causing them to say, yeah, water damage, gotta replace it?

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The issue is the statement by the Tesla rep that bad weather was the cause. Now we don't have any confirmation they said that, but it would take nothing for Tesla to categorically deny that that is an acceptable reason to deny warranty, and state that any rep saying that was at fault. There. Done. Non-story.

If they can't categorically deny that then that implies they actually are employing this excuse for their shoddy workmanship. It certainly wouldn't be the scummiest thing the company has done.

[–] steakmeout@aussie.zone 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What statement? What you read was not a statement but hearsay in the form of a vaguely retold exchange.

Fuck Elon and Tesla but this isn't much to go on.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They got a statement from Tesla who said they were "investigating". You don't need to investigate to know that this is a bullshit reason to give, and their silence on that issue speaks volumes. Now, if the statements by the customers were not given to the Tesla rep to respond to, they would have ample opportunity to put out a statement explaining the problems with the article. Have they done that, or is it just silence? Any media rep worth their salt is absolutely going to be aware of this article.

[–] soupspoon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Scotland is having some pretty extreme weather now, though

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Unless a tree fell on the car it shouldn't stop running because of some wind & rain. This is basic stuff, I don't know why people don't get this.

[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Rain kills cars literally all the time when idiots drive them through flooded roads.

[–] Buelldozer 4 points 1 year ago

"Some wind and rain". The Edinburgh and Cannonmill area, where this story is from, has had at least two floods this month severe enough to submerge parked vehicles.

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

Have you not heard of flooding?

This is basic stuff, I don't know why people don't get this.

Perhaps it's the other way around?

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

I know someone who had to get their Tesla repaired after driving in a puddle. I don't know the size or depth of the puddle though.