I see a whole new generation of gamers who have grown up on these new games that they think are perfect, who didn't see the decades of toil and crap that we did growing up. They expect everything to be the most amazing game they've ever seen, not understanding that perfect games are in fact, exceedingly rare. That most games have bad mechanics, quirks, boring areas, and things we put up with. But younger folks just stamp it as a "bad game" and refuse to see the nuance.

Things like games are a spectrum. There's only 3ish games I mark as perfect. Most will have some things wrong with them. If you don't like that, then just be content with maybe one perfect game a decade.

[–] Pheonixdown@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

While that's true, there's also a huge difference from like 20+ years ago when they more often than not released games as a complete functional product as opposed to a "we hit the date" buy-in beta test. Games just tend to release with less features and polish than they used to, for the most part companies will keep working on it and get it where it needs to be so the final product is comparable, but it makes for a murkier cycle, buy in at release and probably suffer or wait and try to time when it's actually ready.

[–] Frostbeard@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What three games are perfect?

[–] stankmut@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know about the other two, but I know one of them is SimAnt.

[–] Paradox@lemdro.id 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can guarantee you that if SA were released today it would be riddled with micro transactions and covered in dlc

Sandbox mode basically wouldn't exist

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 year ago

Or it would be made by an indie studio.

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Dessert Bus. Boulder Dash. Antix.