this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
59 points (76.6% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !space@mander.xyz

10732 readers
1 users here now

This community is dormant, please find us at !space@mander.xyz

You can find the original sidebar contents below:


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

๐Ÿ”ญ Science

๐Ÿš€ Engineering

๐ŸŒŒ Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Now the only reason this is a terrible idea is that it requires first rendezvousing with a spacecraft every time you want to deorbit it. You'll have the propellent to do this what, 2 or 3 times for every garbage collection spacecraft launched? That's one enormous cost...

[โ€“] bouh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's probably not the case. We have efficient thrusters now. And the spacecraft will stay on the same orbit all its life.

[โ€“] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, we have hall effect thrusters, but it doesn't really matter, the spacecraft still needs to push the mass of both spacecrafts a pretty significant distance and then return to the orbit of was at.

That's just a lot of work.

I'll admit, that using this for cleaning up geostationary orbit is more viable that leo, but it's still questionable how long this will actually be useful.