this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
707 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

59111 readers
3145 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Do you support sustainability, social responsibility, tech ethics, or trust and safety? Congratulations, you’re an enemy of progress. That’s according to the venture capitalist Marc Andreessen.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Billionaires are a symptom, not a cause

[–] akwd169@lemmy.sdf.org 86 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They can be both. Let's step away from the disease terminology and put it plainly.

When there is this much suffering and inequality, billionaires shouldn't be allowed to happen.

No one deserves that much power nor that much wealth when around 75% of all human beings are facing such a disproportionate amount of struggle that its difficult to even describe the comparison.

Billionaires live in a utopic paradise while the majority of humans are trapped in an existence that ranges from intolerable to abhorrent, abject poverty to barely surviving, all the while spending the majority of their time working, which contributes to the billionaires wealth...

[–] uphillbothways@kbin.social 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A fever is a symptom and similarly it is one that must be treated directly to save the life of the patient.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the much stronger analogy. Billionaires are a problem in and of themselves, but only getting rid of billionaires will just lay the groundwork for new billionaires

[–] ericisshort@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It really depends on how you “get rid” of billionaires.

If you do it in a way that ties a wealth limit to minimum wages, then we won’t have billionaires until they raise the income of the lower class to a point where the economic climate permits billionaires. Tying it to a fixed 1,000,000,000 monies would be a horribly flawed design because it would not be inflation proof and would vary across currencies. After all, a billionaire in dollar$ isn’t the same as a billionaire in ¥en.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Within a socdem or capitalist society, neither of those solutions would be effective at eliminating billionaires or the inequality that comes with their existence. The only solution that could guarantee an elimination of billionaires is to seize their property and wealth (they can only have 1 house) and establish a socialist society.

[–] ericisshort@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure how you got multiple solutions out of my comment. I was suggesting instituting a wealth tax (rather than an income tax), which is literally seizing their property and wealth, so I think we are in agreement here that such a solution would be the only way it works. However, I don’t think it should be a fixed monetary limit, rather one that changes based on economic indicators.

[–] trafguy@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We honestly should just replace every single fixed dollar amount in every law with an algebraic formula. It's ridiculous that we design laws to become dated and require replacement.

Minimum wage should be tied to worker productivity, and wealth tax should be tied to the median personal income, including that of non-working adults. Welfare programs should be tied to regional cost of living. Limits on rent should be tied to changes in regional median income.

We're already tracking most or all of that data anyway, might as well put it to maximum use.

[–] ericisshort@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Agreed, and it’s not a novel idea. At least a few smarter countries already create policies that periodically update according to a formula.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 year ago

Fines should scale with wealth. If a billionaire gets a parking ticket, the fine should be tens of thousands of dollars.

Fun side effect is this might encourage the cops to bother the wealthy instead, which might lead to police reform.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

I agree because obviously capitalism pre-exists billionaires by default, but there is also no denying that them being means they have so much more power over every aspect of life than the rest of us, that they now completely control our lives and are absolutely making sure that fighting back becomes harder and harder. To abolish capitalism, we must get rid of the billionaires, they are our biggest hurdle (and are only people, after all).