this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
385 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22058 readers
22 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blazera@kbin.social 101 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The big thing is the Hamas attack wasnt the start of all this. It wasnt Israel minding their own business and Hamas invading for the glory of Islam. The warning cries of a humanitarian crisis were going off long before this recent war, from international humanitarian agencies like Unicef. Gaza was being militarily oppressed by Israel, blocking humanitarian aid, international trade, even denying access to their own waters for fishing.

Civilians were dying off already as a result of Israel, and Israel ignored the warnings, the international community ignored the warnings, and then its shocked pikachus all around as a dying people fight back for survival.

[–] leetnewb@beehaw.org 57 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You can point out back and forth violence going into the 1800s. Nobody has clean hands in this conflict.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 70 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, but siding with Israel here is the logical equivalent of siding with Andrew Jackson and supporting the Indian Removal Act as he committed genocide against the native people.

The power imbalance and how Israel has used it is what makes it imperative that Israel be held accountable by the international community.

[–] knokelmaat@beehaw.org 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm glad you bring up the power imbalance. The "both sides have been doing horrible stuff" only works if both sides have equal footing, which they clearly do not. This does not negate the crimes commited by Hamas, but extremism doesn't come from nowhere and Israël has a responsibility in that.

[–] library_napper@monyet.cc 11 points 1 year ago

Also disproportionate use of force is a war crime. We see Israel doing this in every war with Palestine since the Nakba.

[–] onkyo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Except jews, christians and muslims lived pretty much peacefully together during ottoman rule. The violence worsened when britian controlled palestine and then became a lot worse during the nakba and israeli occupation. It's not about 'having clean hands'. It's about stopping genocide and understanding that occupation and colonialism leads to violent pushback. It always has and always will.

[–] sqgl@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Wasn't the Ottoman period occupation/colonialism too? Not that I am in favour of imperialism but you do raise a fascinating point I wasn't aware of.

[–] onkyo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

The Ottomans took control of palestine after a war with the Mamluk empire. Palestine hasn't been and independent country for much of it's history. It's still a form of occupation but if you were muslim, christian or jewish you still had access to certain rights (unless you were a slave). Mostly if you were muslim.

[–] lefaucet@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

I dont know anything about this. We're they all living in the same neighborhoods or we're they in different neighborhoods in the same city or like different towns in the same Provence?

Just curious how closely bound their networks were. In my home town folks of different faiths are neighbors and mostly go to the same schools and share a government. There's not much segregation at all. Sure, there's racism among all groups, but it gets much weaker and much less frequent with each generation.

Oh yeah and fuck the ole British state. Bunch of tossers meddling all about so they can exploit everyone's resources. Their emancipated colony, all-grown-up now, isn't much better.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Mostly it goes back to the 1940's. There was more history of Zionism beforehand, Jewish settlers gradually coming in to live in the holy land. But after WW2 was the large influx and big push for a Jewish ethnostate. Aaand the people living there already opposed it from the start. And since then it's been very apparent why, because Israel pushes beyond the borders they were already given from Palestinian land, and militarily occupy the Palestinian land they dont yet claim.

[–] sqgl@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It was Arabs who did not accept those borders. They lost and Israel expanded.

What I have more of a problem with is the settlers in the WB and that seems to be Bibi's doing without much pushback from USA. Fascists gonna fasche.

[–] library_napper@monyet.cc 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They were never given a vote. The UN voted to take away the Palestinians' land, and the actual people living there weren't given a single fucking vote in the issue.

[–] sqgl@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What vote? I wasn't talking about any election and neither was blazera (who correctly said Jews were given the land).

I was talking about the 6 day war. Great animation showing the history here https://youtu.be/m19F4IHTVGc/

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

What vote?

Timeline:

  • 1947 - The resolution was voted on by the UN
  • Arab countries didn't accept it
  • Civil war between Zionists and non-Zionists
  • 1948 - A day before Britain's retreat, Israel claims all the land
  • A day later, Arab countries attack Israel in order to "push the Jews into the sea"
  • Israel wins most of the land, except Gaza and Cisjordania

Jews were given the land

Well... kind of, but not really, not exactly that land, and the result wasn't truly agreed upon by anyone.

the 6 day war

That's in 1967. Israel wasn't "given" any land there, it used a provocation by Egypt in order to claim all of it (and have Egypt give thanks for not claiming all of Sinai too... for now).

[–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 2 points 1 year ago

There was also a lot of bribery and intimidation involved to get the vote to come out a certain way.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] library_napper@monyet.cc 2 points 1 year ago

The vote to create Israel in 1948

[–] blazera@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do i keep hearing it described like losing a game? Zionists invaded, murdered, and exiled palestinians from their land, that should "win" them nothing but opposition from the international community, same as happening with Russias invasion of Ukraine.

[–] sqgl@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Why do i keep hearing it described like losing a game?

What do you mean by "it"?

I thought we were talking specifically about changes to the borders of what was given to them (irresponsibly?) by the Allies after WW2.

The 6 day war in 1967 was initiated by surrounding Arab countries. Israel won that war and expanded into the Sinai and Gaza (Egypt), Golan Heights (Syria), West Bank and East Jerusalem (Jordan). They didn't initiate the expansion. They then returned the Sinai to Egypt.

Admittedly after that they did take more without provocation. The chipping away with settlements is happening to this very day.

I just rewatched the above video in order to spell out the details. It is all new to me. Have a look yourself if you are genuinely interested in discussing the conflict. It really is well made and easy to follow (I dunno if there are errors though).

[–] blazera@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nothing was ever given to them, only taken. They were living there already. They did not consent to being murdered and evicted from where they lived, and predictably they fought against it. That they lost against a much larger, internationally backed army invading their land doesnt exactly persuade me that they should lose their right to living there.

[–] sqgl@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Nothing was ever given to them, only taken

Who is "them"? I was talking about the land given to Jews by the colonisers: England and France.

The 6 day war had a larger army on the Arab side. I dunno how much financial backing Israel had from USA or how it compared with the backing (if any) by the Arab oil states and I doubt you know or care either.

I am trying to learn here, but you just insist on lazy mud slinging. Blocking you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It was not Palestine at that time though and Jews always lived in the area.

[–] library_napper@monyet.cc 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This issue has nothing to do with Jews. It has to do with Zionism.

Jews have lived there peacefully, yes. They did so without stealing their neighbors land. Its the Zionists that formed Israel and stole ~40% of Palesines land that caused the war.

There have always been Jews opposed to Zionism since the idea was first thought up.

[–] sqgl@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

After the Nazi shit and the reluctance of the West to accept refugees I can understand why.

And look at the rise of cookers who think we live on a flat earth run by a cabal of Jewish shape-shifting lizards from the planet Nibiru. I do not think social progress by humanity is inevitable anymore.

Nazi Germany could really happen again. Just last week in Australia a judge revealed himself to be a Nazi sympathiser... https://old.reddit.com/r/auslaw/comments/17hecdx/comment/k6nuov1/

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)

After the Nazi shit and the reluctance of the West to accept refugees

Zionism starts in the 1800s, well before the Nazi shit. The 1940's One Million Plan actually got amended after the Holocaust by stirring up a civil war so more Jews from Arab countries would flee in fear of prosecution in order to meet the Zionist numbers, precisely because "too many" Western countries were accepting (or got forced to accept) Holocaust refugees, who were nowhere as many as previously expected (by the Zionists).

Nazi Germany could really happen again

Not exactly. Genocides have been going on all the time, just the countries and ethnicities have been changing. So you could say it's been happening all along... while the chance of the same exact combination repeating, is quite low.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] blazera@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I dont care that they were ottoman or british ruled, it was palestinians living there, and they opposed zionism from the beginning

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You can go back much much further than the 1800s, back to the start of zionism.

[–] library_napper@monyet.cc 9 points 1 year ago

There have always been Jews opposed to Zionism since the idea was created. Its almost like stealing someone elsea land is immoral.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I do agree the Hamas attack wasn't the start of this. However tactically it was incredibly silly, honestly what did they think would happen?

They gave Netanyahu, who was finally fumbling at the reigns after almost thirty years aan excuse to execute his wet dreams and all of Israel uniting behind him.

I see no way how they could have thought the attack would benefit their cause.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dont think people are appreciating the context of Gazans dying off. It wasnt a stable situation that was fine to continue as it was going, imagine youre locked in a room with a lunatic with a knife trying to kill you. Youre not likely to beat the lunatic, but youre gonna try, you dont have any other options.

Waiting didnt work, protests didnt work, pleading with the international community didnt work, they cant leave. Everyone keeps saying they shouldnt have fought back, but what should they have done? Nothing is not available as an option.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I appreciate that and I have equated the current war to the Warsaw ghetto uprising. I'm not an apologist.

However, as Sun Zu said, you must not interrupt your enemy when he's making a mistake. Netanyahu's might was failing. Israeli youth was rising up against him.

It's not like they absolutely needed to do this right now, and they could've quite easily understood what the response would be (maybe not the entire extent).

Tactically it was stupid.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What authority was netanyahu losing? Or are you just referring to there being some chance of him losing an election? Because Gaza did wait and see for several elections. He was just reelected in 2022. So apparently he's not being voted out.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Israeli youth was rising up against him.

"Rising up" insomuch as they were protesting his proposed changes, not in that they were contemplating actually removing him from power, or even trying to oust/disband/etc Likud.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They did a little more than simply "fight back." They also engaged in widespread and utterly gratuitous acts of violence and torture in ways that can only have been calculated to trigger an overreaction on the part of Israel. They knew exactly what they were doing and what would happen. They obviously don't give a fuck about their own people.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Where you getting torture from?

[–] FaulerFuffi@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Why doesn't Egypt open the border?

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because Israel will never let them back in if they leave. That is not hypothetical; it happened to thousands of Palestinians during the 6-day war, and their families are still stuck in Egypt, Syria, and Lebanon today.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago

It's also because Hamas has its origins in the Muslim Brotherhood which for obvious reasons means that Egypt is very leery of accepting Palestinians from Gaza.

I'm not defending their position, just explaining it; Egypt is basically a military dictatorship at this point and the Muslim Brotherhood is enemy number one for them.

[–] bear@slrpnk.net 24 points 1 year ago

Why doesn't Israel stop doing things that require other countries to intervene

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They don't want them either.

All the Arab world may be united in it's hatred of Israel, but that doesn't mean they like each other...

[–] livus@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@Blackmist it's not about "like" it's about realpolitik.

2 million refugees into Egypt would be like suddenly allowing 6 million refugees into the US. Political suicide for anyone that did it.

Especially if it meant you were likely going to get a border war with a notoriously land-stealing nation as well.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Why do you think a Levantine Trail of Tears is an acceptable solution rather than ethnic cleansing?

[–] livus@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

@FaulerFuffi assuming that's a genuine question there are a bunch of reasons and one is they don't want to open themselves up to being attacked by Israel.

Why Egypt Won't Open The Border To Its Palestinian Neighbours.

500 people came through recently iirc.

load more comments (1 replies)