this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
33 points (97.1% liked)

Canada

10141 readers
974 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Misinformation is not welcome here.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The OHRC said while caste is not a prescribed protected category, it is covered by international human rights law and hence, can be protected under the Ontario Human Rights Code.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Having to explicitly define every protected category in law seems ridiculous. Surely a description of what a protected category looks like would be more consistent and future proof.

[–] totallynotarobot@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If "don't be an asshole" worked, we wouldn't need most of the rest of the laws. Sadly it doesn't. I don't quite understand why.

[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because there is no consensus on what an "asshole" is.

"I'm not an asshole; I just tell it like it is." — some asshole somewhere every five minutes

[–] totallynotarobot@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah. You're absolutely right. But it's fun to pretend we could all be reasonable together.

[–] Cory_t_@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

They're created this way on purpose, to leave room for hating people in the future we might not know we hate yet. That's the type of "future proof" we're after, right?

[–] Cobrachickenwing@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

Stupid rules are created because of stupid people.

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If I'm not mistaken, there are general descriptions too, so I don't think the list is exclusive. I think it's a good idea to specify what categories you can so that in future human rights challenges, you don't have various interested groups trying to argue differing interpretations. Interpretations of vague language can vary and this can tend to lead us away from the spirit of an otherwise good law.