this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
474 points (87.9% liked)

World News

39023 readers
2321 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

People are used to seeing stark warnings on tobacco products alerting them about the potentially deadly risks to health. Now a study suggests similar labelling on food could help them make wiser choices about not just their health, but the health of the planet.

The research, by academics at Durham University, found that warning labels including a graphic image – similar to those warning of impotence, heart disease or lung cancer on cigarette packets – could reduce selections of meals containing meat by 7-10%.

It is a change that could have a material impact on the future of the planet. According to a recent YouGov poll, 72% of the UK population classify themselves as meat-eaters. But the Climate Change Committee (CCC), which advises the government on its net zero goals, has said the UK needs to slash its meat consumption by 20% by 2030, and 50% by 2050, in order to meet them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bumblefumble@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If no one buys beef, there would be no beef industry, they don't produce stuff for fun.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

beef was produced long before anyone bought it. there is no reason to think it will ever stop.

[–] Bumblefumble@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There won't be industrial style cattle farms if no one will buy their products, that surely can't be hard to comprehend. If it doesn't make any money, it's not gonna be done.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

there were industrial iPhone manufacturing facilities before anyone ever bought an iPhone.

[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, just like the egg must have come before the chicken - you have to build the first iPhone factory before you sell the first iPhone.

How many Blackberry factories still operate? Palm pilot factories?

Capitalists market goods and create demand for them. But that demand requires people to buy their products.

Sheep production in the US peaked at 51 million head, back in 1884. Today, there's only 5 million head of sheep. Consumer preferences absolutely impacts what farmers grow.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sheep production in the US peaked at 51 million head, back in 1884. Today, there’s only 5 million head of sheep. Consumer preferences absolutely impacts what farmers grow.

i think, given the choice, many people would prefer wool over sythetics, but the price difference is incredible. look at any american made textile from that era.

i'm afraid you've fallen for the "post hoc ergo propter hoc".

[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When was the last time you had mutton for dinner?

In 1884, how often would you be eating mutton?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago

if you have something to say, say it. i don't see the point in your rhetorical questions.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

do you have a plan to get everyone to stop buying beef?

[–] Bumblefumble@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, isn't this post specifically about a plan to help with that? Also maybe by not spreading shit takes like yours and try to show the value of decreasing consumption.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 year ago

you are the one that proposed the solution required everyone to stop buying beef. if you don't have a plan, it's not a very good solution