492

Every goddamn time I'm trying to make something for my DnD game (lemmy.world)

submitted 8 months ago by Stamets@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world

167 comments fedilink hide all child comments

CloudConvert.com might as well be my fucking home page.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] LucidLethargy@lemmy.world 80 points 7 months ago

People just really need to support it. It's far better than jpg or png. It's the go-to for web right now, that's for sure.

[-] hansl@lemmy.world 31 points 7 months ago

Not better than jpegXL which has clearer free licensing.

[-] LucidLethargy@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago

Only Apple supports this. Like, literally just Apple. I hate Chrome, and even Chrome doesn't support this. Firefox? Yeah, zero support.

So for these reasons it's 100% not viable right now. If you get the support, I'll consider it for my websites, and tell my colleagues about it, though.

[-] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Firefox supports JXL just fine and chrome did support it, but pulled support shortly after.

[-] LucidLethargy@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

This is the source I used to originally validate my position: https://caniuse.com/jpegxl

Let me know if it's incorrect, I'd be very interested to learn of new options for the web space as a developer. This said, I googled Firefox and it came back with only "experimental support" for what I think may be an alpha release (version number ends in "a").

[-] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I think you still need to enable JXL in the config, but it seems to display just fine once enabled.

Adding support for JXL in windows was much more of a hassle and doesn't always display properly in the file preview. Hopefully windows follows Apple's step soon and adds native support.

I guess as a Web developer it won't matter until the JXL toggle is enabled by default though.