this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
449 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3468 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 75 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So what? They already have one book they read all the time, you think they'll read any of this one?

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They don't read the one book either.

[–] Something_Complex@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They bought it and places it in a shelf in the bathroom.( I say bathroom cuz I can't imagine there are books any where else in a trump supporter's house)

[–] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago

There's the big one they put on display in the living room for guests to see how pious they are.

[–] Addition@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's in a book. They'll never find out...

[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If those Iowa Evangelicals could read they'd be very upset!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Imagine if they read their own Bible one day...

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

One thing Maga has distinguished is the difference between Christians and Maga Christians.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"What is a man profited if he gain the whole world, but lose his soul."

"A lot. He has profited a lot."

Lol.

[–] nixcamic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I think the Christmas bit is my favorite.

[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've seen no difference, if someone says they're a christian, then they are

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Most are Maga Christians. Well really we can drop the Christian part. They pretended to be christians, but they were Maga under the guise of christian.

[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

they are not pretending to be christians, those are christians.

[–] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're also Christian. Everything they embrace can be found in the Bible in both Old Testament and New Testament.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Most Trump supporters would burst into hellfire if they ever actually touched a Bible

[–] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

That’s why so many American Christians love him - they’re so much alike!

If there’s one thing our Christians are known for, it’s being as un-christ-like as possible.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Look up supply side Jesus, look up how many christy denominations like SDA who supported and pushed for vaccinations, love not hate, support not bigotry. They’re all the same?

There is no such thing as “Christians” when it comes to blanket definitions and groupings. The world is far more complex than that, and so are christy religions.

Now, I can just feel the “no true Scotsman” counter coming. To be sure we’re on the same page:

The no true Scotsman fallacy is the attempt to defend a generalization by denying the validity of any counterexamples given. By changing the definition of who or what belongs to a group or category, the speaker can conveniently dismiss any example that proves the generalization doesn’t hold.

So given this, when we have these morons going on about things like this: https://newrepublic.com/post/174950/christianity-today-editor-evangelicals-call-jesus-liberal-weak

multiple pastors had told him they would quote the Sermon on the Mount, specifically the part that says to “turn the other cheek,” when preaching. Someone would come up after the service and ask, “Where did you get those liberal talking points?”

“What was alarming to me is that in most of these scenarios, when the pastor would say, ‘I’m literally quoting Jesus Christ,’ the response would not be, ‘I apologize.’ The response would be, ‘Yes, but that doesn’t work anymore. That’s weak,’” Moore said. “When we get to the point where the teachings of Jesus himself are seen as subversive to us, then we’re in a crisis.”

These people reject christ and his teachings, they aren’t just simply not living up to the ideals of Jesus, They OUTRIGHT REJECT CHRIST and the teachings of love/kindness/respect. Respect for the prostitutes, the diseased or disabled, the poor, etc., these things are the opposite of what these gelical hate-fucks believe and support.

And as Trump swings ever further right, it makes sense that people who believe he will solve their problems will follow blindly.

Once again, a significant departure from the teachings of Christ to the ramblings of an orange asshole. They’re trump cockian, not christian.

Most of these supply-siders treat their christy bs as nothing more than a brand name or tribal identity with very few actual beliefs attached. The name of their religion is just a verbal shorthand for whatever their peer group thinks is good, so if you're a hardcore propertarian and your tribal identity is "Christian", then boom, you have an interpretation of Jesus that that contradicts everything Jesus is supposed to represent.

But go ahead, tell us how they’re all the same.

[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no one said all christians are the same - though the differences are nominal at best, in my opinion - we simply said that all christians are christians

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You said you see no difference, then when someone points out the difference, you say they're not all the same. .........

Maga has warped into their own thing. You can even see it when the leader of Maga calls them [see article].

Or see articles how Maga people are leaving their church because the church is not extreme enough.

[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I said the differences are nominal, meaning they don't ultimately matter when you are living a life of magical thinking at the expense of those around you.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah you tried to cover it up when confronted.

See again how Magas are leaving their churches because the churches aren't extreme enough.

[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not covering anything up, and I don't feel there's been any confrontation.
I think christianity is frankly embarrassing, the fact that a judean blood-mystery cult has survived to the 21st century is again, embarrassing.
there's nothing unique about christianity, it came from a time and place that churned out these cults almost a means of necessity; it's all bronze-aged fan fiction and I don't care which one is your favorite when they are all so revolting and insulting to all it is to be human.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Now you're going on a weird rant instead of seeing the very, very apparent and very large difference between Christian and Maga ~~Christian~~ (we can drop the Christian part).

[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it seems like you're really not following, best of luck I suppose

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Funny because I think the same thing. You seem to have no sense of extremism, no scale of how severe or mild something is.

[–] nixcamic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There are limits. It's perfectly fine to call out hypocrites. If I say I'm an atheist but strongly believe in God that would just be dumb.

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Doesn't matter. They'll still vote for him.