this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
764 points (93.5% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3866 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Yes, and if he was locked up without due process, it would say something else.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago (17 children)

They lock people up without due process awaiting trial all the time though right?

[–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Depends, there's certainly a good argument to be made that the bail system is flawed, etc. But trump was arraigned and is out on bail.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes you're right, I forgot about the bail part. And the bail system certainly is flawed. Generally aren't you not allowed to leave your state if you're out on bail?

[–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

It depends on the state and the bail conditions, which can be modified. Restrictions are based on priors, flight risk, violent tendency, etc.

That's why the gag orders make the news. To your point, folks would be knocked for shit like that.

This line is being crossed on purpose. He can get his propaganda out, and if he actually gets tagged, that's even better propaganda.

Which sucks. But, I imagine the decision-making by the courts is based on avoiding creating a political prisoner out of him. So, we deal with a flawed system, increase fines, and wait for the process to unfold.

"May we live in interesting times" and all that.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Yes I think I have to agree that (I hope) there is a long game going on where they are minimizing the chance of asking for appeal, a slam dunk case. And of course his base would love nothing more than to have him in prison, as theb he becomes a martyr. For what's its worth id rather live in boring times!

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If there's one lesson I've learned in my 48 years, it's that boring moments are underrated and moments are overrated. Everyone says they are bored and want some excitement, but excitement doesn't mean good things. More often than not, it is something bad. I'd rather have a boring day than an exciting one.

I still hope that one day politics will be boring again. No "if the Republican gets into office democracy might fail." No "Trump is calling for the arrest of anyone who spoke up against him." Just "the two major party candidates have differing opinions but both would lead this country competently." Make Politics Boring Again!

[–] misophist@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

You claim to only have 48 years on this earth, but you talk about getting back to a time that hasn't existed in at least that long. Are you just reminiscing about rose-tinted stories you heard from your elders? The "good times" they want to return to were anything but for many of us.

[–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Exactly, me too!

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago (19 children)

If he wasn't wealthy and white he'd be behind bars right now awaiting trial.

[–] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He's wealthy and orange though.

[–] Techmaster@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

wealthy*

* not really

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

Due process does not mean, "scott free until there's a guilty verdict", you utter numpty. These aren't all civil charges.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Mamertine@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (4 children)

The wheels of justice grind very slowly. The bigger the case, the longer it takes to build.

But yes, I'm getting impatient. There should be consequences for trying to overthrow the government.

[–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Yes, fair. I want an air tight case, and that takes time. It's frustrating. But a flimsy case would be worse. Putting him directly into jail would be worse and set a terrible precedent. People seem eager to fall head first into his narrative.

[–] IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Not rich people wait in jail while the case is built. They pay outrageously high bonds if they don't wait in jail. This guy has done neither, and is accused of High Treason

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago

"Justice delayed is justice denied", especially if it's delayed long enough for the defendant to dismantle the justice system itself.

[–] Techmaster@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

He should have been arrested on the spot and thrown into gitmo while the courts decide what to do with the body.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I just want him to get the same treatment I would get if I committed a serious crime in broad daylight.

[–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Sure, we'll all be waiting for a verdict with baited breath.