Technology

37716 readers

516 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

Los@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

138

Inside the 'arms race' between YouTube and ad blockers (www.engadget.com)

submitted 11 months ago by Bebo@literature.cafe to c/technology@beehaw.org

36 comments fedilink hide all child comments

From the article: “In some ways, the current situation has spurred an arms race. YouTube has inadvertently improved ad blockers, as the new knowledge and techniques gained from innovating within the YouTube platform are also applicable to other ad and tracking systems.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The problem is that YouTube will always offer the best terms for initial creators. Hosting is free, the platform will sometimes help advertise you to your likely audience, and it may offer the first way to monetize the channel. A federated system isn't going to provide nearly the same benefits.

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

YouTube does have the advantage of scale, I wouldn't expect a federated solution to match their condition, but I'm hoping it can become good-enought as an alternative.

PeerTube isn't going to provide a solution, they explicitly state this in their FAQ. But there's no reason why other platform couldn't handle monetization AND federate through AgtivityPub (or its successor). If Nebula or Patreon wanted, they could join the federation and make some videos accessible this way. The one holdout would be video that are only accessible to paid subscribers, they wouldn't make them freely accessible via a federation.

From the PeerTube FAQ:

the uploader can display a support button under the video [..]

We did not go any further, as we refuse to tie our code to a particular content funding method, that might not fit all communities and deter others. It's the reason why we encourage developers to use the PeerTube plugin API to create their own monetization system.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 11 months ago

None of the three items I mentioned involved scale. Two of them mentioned cost to host and one mentioned advertising the creators' work.

The CEO of Nebula has explicitly stated he isn't creating a YouTube competitor. Nebula has a paywall which is important to its business model. It could never afford self hosting for free.

Even if PeerTube solves the hosting cost problem, you still have two advantages that a YouTube like system has over a PeerTube like system.