this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
390 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3868 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 54 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As soon as the debate ended, CNN began post-game coverage

This is the problem with US politics. Turn your elections into a sports match and people are gonna tribe up. Total circus.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Turn the news into a for-profit industry, and you get competition for eyes.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

While the news has always been a for-profit industry, Citizens United turned election years into billion dollar windfalls for news outfits.

I’m pretty sure that’s why USA Today owns almost all the local papers in my state. They can float the payrolls between election years, or cut a bunch of local reporters and send their own around following primaries in the state with the most campaign money each week.

[–] maccentric@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don’t believe the news was always for-profit. Early television news actually cost the station money and was provided as a service for the public good. Things took a turn for the worse sometime in the sixties, accelerating through the eighties and devolving into the shitshow we have today.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don’t believe the news was always for-profit.

No it wasn't, and it would referred to as the Fourth Estate.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Look at the history of newspapers. They started a war at one point to sell more papers. Which is how the term yellow journalism was coined.

It’s true that the fairness doctrine made broadcast news better for the period when they were losing money, right up to about when Kennedy was assassinated, but that’s been long gone for decades, and only really helped radio and OTA TV.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

It’s true that the fairness doctrine made broadcast news better

My comment that you replied to was related just to broadcast news, and not newspapers. The Big Three.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Turn the news into a for-profit industry

No more Fourth Estate for you!