cross-posted from: https://lemmy.whynotdrs.org/post/494473
Compared against the predominant incumbent social media platforms, the fediverse is very small.
information sources:
this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
1378 points (99.1% liked)
Selfhosted
37904 readers
450 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Why this many people use Snapchat is incomprehensible
There are so many good messenger apps and all of them, Snapchat's giant userbase remains
I use it for the same reason I use anything, the people I talk with are there. I already drew a hard line in the sand with some devices and Windows.
Snapchat is a line I drew. It’s probably my single least favourite messaging option
I really hate it but I still have active group chats that I haven't had luck getting elsewhere. I get the impression it's the same for most people because I haven't heard anyone say anything positive about it in years
Hell, why do this many people use LinkedIn? The whole platform was built off of scraping Windows user's address books without permission, sending unsolicited emails to all of those contacts using the name of that user, and pretending like they were such a great platform that of course your friends are inviting you to also join. And I'm pretty sure they still use this practice today because I continue to get emails from people who have no idea why their name is being attached to the spam I receive.
LinkedIn is very useful for job searching and networking. I don't post on there, but it was key to getting several job offers.
I'm not aware of any other professional social networks.
I guess it just annoys me that they built a product on incredibly shady practices and have somehow managed to wedge themselves in to the business world under the guise of being "legitimate". Trusting anything on their site, to me, feels as risky as trusting anything you see on Yelp -- sure a real person might have posted the review, or maybe the business paid their blackmail tax to not get de-listed, but how many better opportunities are not being shown because the company deleted all their positive reviews?
I mean, sure, it's not good if they did sketchy stuff to bootstrap their network. I hadn't heard there before but I wouldn't be surprised.
But I don't think it's really the same as Yelp. Or at least not how I use it. Trust isn't really a factor. I don't use LinkedIn to review a company. I don't look at their soulless posts about how great their team is. I use it to see "do I know anyone who works at this place that has an opening I want?" Then when I see my old friend is a manager there, I shoot him a message (possibly not even via LinkedIn if it's someone I know well) and ask if it's someplace I would want to work at. There's not really a lot of room for fake in that process.
Also sometimes recruiters just message me. Some of them suck but that's not really particular to LinkedIn.
You're not thinking of Glassdoor, are you? Because that's more like yelp and I don't especially trust the positive reviews on there.
I don't really want to go to bat for Microsoft though. I'd be happier if there was a better professional network out there. But, you know, capitalist hellscape.
LinkedIn is a “need” for the ones wanting a job and trying to tell their new job /company is the best. Once these needs are satisfied they forget about it and only come back when the need arises again.
I’m in IT management at my company, the general management and HR folks basically require anyone in a leadership position to have a filled out LinkedIn profile with it linked to your Office account so it shows up in your outlook card and linked in your signature. So we look “professional and tech-driven” since all social media is lumped in with the tech industry for some reason
Different generations choosing different platforms I guess: >40 using facebook and <25 joined Snapchat.
Don't know why you got downvoted. There is absolutely an "age" component to why people use a certain platform.
Social platforms have enormous retention leverage also. Once all your friends are there...
The age component is absolutely a reason and so is the leverage of the community and friends like you said. No doubt about it. It’s herd mentality and FOMO. Finally it is also how easy to get in and stay sucked in. These other platforms have the dopamine trigger game figured out on their apps. Fediverse doesn’t have that so much, other than the organic “did someone reply to me?” feeling. If you don’t engage then fediverse is not pulling you in.
Ngl FB Messenger is way better than Snapchat.
I don’t like Meta but at least the app feels like it isn’t making its users even more ADHD by the minute