572
submitted 6 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The lawyer said he’s baffled that prosecutors pursued the case and that a youth judge oversaw a sentence that included probation and requiring the child to write a report about Kobe Bryant.

A 10-year-old Black child in Mississippi who urinated in public in August was sentenced Tuesday in youth court to three months' probation, a decision the child’s attorney says was influenced by race.

Quantavious Eason, who is in the third grade, was arrested by Senatobia police Aug. 10 after a police officer saw him relieving himself outside next to his mom’s car when the woman was inside an attorney’s office, according to family attorney Carlos Moore.

Given the circumstances, any child would have done the same thing, Moore said. He noted there was no public restroom at the attorney’s office.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Squirrelsdrivemenuts@lemmy.world 83 points 6 months ago

Even if this were a grown man.. how is peeing in public a jail sentence or probation?? Here you just get a fine. Or am I too european to understand?

[-] Cap@lemm.ee 69 points 6 months ago

Not only that put if you do it as an adult you will be put on the sexual offenders list for life. Yay America!

[-] khannie@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

OK that's fucked up. Is that in all states?

[-] Fosheze@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

Technically it can happen. Usually is doesn't. Peeing in public is technically indecent exposure if you are seen (which someone has to see you to catch you anyways). Indecent exposure is considered a sexual offence and can be tried as such.

But from what I've seen in my area of the US if you get caught pissing in public you will just get a fine unless you are a frequent repeat offender or there is some extenuating curcumstance like doing it in full view of other people. It's one of those things where technically it can get you labeled as a sex offender but it rarely actually does. Of course we have plenty of corrupt judges and that decision lies solely with them so it is always a possibility.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

No. California recently got rid of or changed it though I forget the particulars other than it doesn't come with a sex offender charge now. Another state had also done much the same before California did. Michigan, I think?

[-] khannie@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

European here. Public urination is illegal and a friend of mine was nearly charged for peeing on the side of the road on a country lane at the woods when we were kids (edit: around 16).

This whole thing is crazy though. 10 year olds need to pee.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 6 months ago

There's also a big difference between doing it on a street and doing it in the country road. The main difference being you're not peeing on concrete.

[-] noobnarski@feddit.de 2 points 6 months ago

Here in Germany it is illegal and you can get fined (no jailtime, as long as you dont try to show your dick to everyone).

But I have never heard of anyone getting fined for it, but I only know people who pee in bushes and shit, no one that is so trashy that they pee on buildings and stuff, because I would imagine that those cases are prosecuted much more stringently.

If you stop at any reststop at a highway or country road its also not very unlikely to see someone peeing into some bushes.

[-] xenspidey@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 months ago

Dogs can pee wherever they want... No one gets arrested for dog pee

this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
572 points (98.0% liked)

News

21730 readers
4952 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS