this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
125 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37724 readers
633 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More efforts from tech bros to build Rapture.

Interesting quotes:

it had backing from tech heavyweights such as billionaire Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, AngelList co-founder Naval Ravikant, and venture capitalist** Fred Wilson**, a Coinbase board member who sold his shares in the company for $1.8 billion after it went public in 2021.

“Bitcoin, if it wins, completely changes the world, because it changes the ability of centralized states to do what they’ve been doing,” Srinivisan said in a presentation delivered to a Bitcoin conference in Amsterdam in October.

The Bitcoin-based Network State will be based on “internet values” such as “open source” and “peer-to-peer,” Srinivasan has written.

An utopia run on Bitcoin? What could possibly go wrong?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Srinivasan has floated the car-free Culdesac private community in Tempe and the Peter Thiel-backed Próspera in Honduras as examples of currently-existing proto-Network States.

“Suppose you found a new startup society like Culdesac on the basis of car-free living…which is an innovation in parallel transportation.

Is "fuck cars" libertarian?

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Maybe in a twisted thought process: privatized public transport for the masses, and because the rich have no actual restrictions in reality, I’m sure they can drive a car if they want to.

[–] sculd@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Good question. Since "libertarian" in practice always becomes some form of authoritarian state. They just jumped a few steps ahead.

On the other hand though, car-free city sounds so nice.

[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago

"libertarian" in practice always becomes some form of authoritarian state.

What has been libertarian in practice?

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 3 points 11 months ago

Until a Libertarian decides he wants to drive a car. You can't expect discipline from these assholes.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nearly all pollution violates the NAP

[–] drwho@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago