this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
1525 points (99.9% liked)

Technology

36769 readers
211 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheSaneWriter@lemmy.thesanewriter.com 191 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Congrats to Firefox, it really has made substantial improvements over the years.

[–] danisth@lemmy.world 73 points 2 years ago

Firefox a few years ago would kill my Mac battery in a couple hours, now it’s as good as safari for energy management. No reason not to use it as a daily driver now.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Maybe it'll start maintaining Mozilla again. You know: its namesake project.

[–] NorwegianBlues@sh.itjust.works 43 points 2 years ago

Mozilla Suite, the thing discontinued seventeen years ago!?

[–] pungunner@feddit.de 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There is a project called Mozilla? Afaik it is the company name? What is it?

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Mozilla is the name of the Open Source version of Netscape Navigator. It is the pre-cursor to Firefox.

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Not only that, they had goals beyond just a browser. They wanted to create a whole OS ecosystem integrated with the browser. They released Firefox as a side project to just get a browser in everyone's hands while they worked on Mozilla. Turns out the OS ecosystem in a browser was a bust, and Firefox was a winner. Just the Mozilla devs haven't stopped being bitter about it. The old Netscape motivations around the project have been a boat anchor.

[–] russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There was the Firefox mobile OS but apparently that didn't pan out too well it seems. I remember vaguely hearing about it long ago, but not by much.

[–] delta@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I remember that! Pretty sure I tried it out on my Nexus 5. It was cool but even then it seemed an impossible hill to climb. Looks like it was forked into a feature phone OS that’s maintained to this day!

[–] pungunner@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean didn't they achieve that? Today a lot of things are web based. Firefox is a powerful browser. Especially on Android. So if you want you can have your OS in a browser thingy...

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago

Not at all. They created a great browser, which is what us end users wanted, but they never achieved their ecosystem goals.

[–] Justaregulardude2001@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Now all we need is that it provides a better experience than Chrome.

[–] Cornelius@lemmy.ml 37 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Meh, I'll be honest and say that I'm not impressed by chrome in modern day. While I hate Microsoft, edge is a nicer browser to use than chrome, and that's saying something

[–] Justaregulardude2001@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I agree, but I think that the normies like to use Chrome because... that's what everyone is using, so I am eager to see how FF can give a better experience to the normal user.

[–] tehcpengsiudai@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Normies (also me) use Gmail, it's easy when you login to your browser and you're partially already authenticated everywhere else.

Same goes for android.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

it’s easy when you login to your browser and you’re ~~partially already authenticated~~ automatically sending your personal, private information everywhere else.

FTFY

You're correct, but the majority of normies don't care. A lot of people don't naturally feel a strong impulse towards privacy, so the fact that Google knows everything about them doesn't really bother them.

[–] westyvw@lemm.ee 27 points 2 years ago

It already does. I dislike using Chrome. Firefox works better, looks better, and containers are really useful to me.

[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I’ll stick to Safari. I don’t trust Mozilla any more than Google or Microsoft.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ah yes, an open source popular browser that is made by a nonprofit organization is less trustworthy than a close source browser made by a public company

[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago

An open source organization with a track record of dubious user-hostile behavior.

Example one

Example two

Apple does not add plugins to my browser without my consent, nor do they show ads in my browser.

[–] TheSaneWriter@lemmy.thesanewriter.com 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Isn't Safari made by Apple? It's not like Apple is some paragon of corporate virtue, why do you trust them?

[–] kimpilled@infosec.pub 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If you’re running Safari, you’re already running their OS. If Apple wants to spy on you, they’ve already got the means to do so, so you’ve already decided to trust them.

Switching to Chrome or Firefox means trusting one more entity in addition to Apple. This expands your possible exposure.

[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because with Apple I’m the paying customer, not the product being sold.

You're always both. With Apple, it doesn't sell your data, but it does sell curated ad space where they use your data to power their tools. While this is less of an invasion of privacy than Google or the atrocity of Meta's privacy policy, it still exists on a spectrum of how much companies are willing to use your data for extra profit. I'm not saying to not use Apple, hell I'm currently using Microsoft Edge, but I think it's important to understand that literally every profit-driven company is subject to the same systemic flaws and none of them can be completely trusted.