317
submitted 6 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) said he would support the legal fund of a man who is accused of vandalizing a display by The Satanic Temple inside the Iowa Capitol on Thursday.

Michael Cassidy was charged with fourth-degree criminal mischief for knocking over and destroying a statue erected by the temple inside the capitol, The Des Moines Register first reported.

“Satan has no place in our society and should not be recognized as a ‘religion’ by the federal government,” DeSantis said on X, formerly Twitter. “I’ll chip in to contribute to this veteran’s legal defense fund. Good prevails over evil — that’s the American spirit.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 209 points 6 months ago

Ron is falling for the trap. This ends with all religious symbols being removed.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 101 points 6 months ago

Actually, I think this likely ends with Michael Cassidy paying TST for vandalizing their statue. Which means ol' Ronnie is effectively making a donation to TST.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 50 points 6 months ago

They should send him a thank you letter with the Tenets and sign him up for their mailing list

[-] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

TST is not evil. They would not add him to their mailing list.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

They would if there was a chance he'd read them:

"The struggle for justice is an ongoing and necessary pursuit that should prevail over laws and institutions"

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 months ago

They don’t have a mailing list actually. Likely because people would sign up religious people just to be annoying.

[-] Jeremyward@lemmy.world 53 points 6 months ago

Who knows with this Supreme Court..

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 66 points 6 months ago

The Supreme Court would have to rule Christianity is the only legal religion which violates established law.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 71 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They could pull the same bullshit they did with the Pledge and the Motto, saying that they were culturally relevant and had no religious effect because nobody takes the pledge or the motto that seriously. "Nativity scenes have a long tradition in local govern buildings yadda yadda christofascism."

[-] LeadSoldier@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago

The fact that the supreme Court can use that argument is insane. Is not washing our hands before surgery American tradition? Is slavery American tradition? Just because we've done something before, doesn't make it legal in any other topic area.

Americans also just renamed some of their Christian holidays in order to pretend that there's equality. My daughter still has to do homework during Chanukkah every night but gets the week of Christmas off but now the same exact vacation from school is called "winter break" so it's totally "not religious now."

[-] ZzyzxRoad@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 months ago

My daughter still has to do homework during Chanukkah every night but gets the week of Christmas off

Was just thinking about this with my college, as finals week is during Chanukkah. I don't think concessions should be made for any religion, but it's definitely a blatant sign that christians think they are more important than everyone else and that it's essentially already the state religion in the US.

[-] skydivekingair@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

That would be an argument for not putting the statue up, not a solid case that a random citizen has the right to destroy the property. The statue was up and he has the right to petition or sue for removal, not to take it into his own hands even if the statue was up illegally. But I’m not a law person so I could be off the mark.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

So, completely plausible.

[-] Techmaster@lemm.ee 17 points 6 months ago

Like that would stop them.

[-] TheDannysaur@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

Not in Iowa. I live here. They will absolutely remove the Satanic symbol and proclaim that it is because of religious freedom.

...it will make sense to them.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

The courts will not take the same view though. And that's the point.

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 months ago

No, it doesn’t. It ends with only Christian shit remaining.

this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
317 points (97.3% liked)

politics

18059 readers
3089 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS