this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
842 points (90.6% liked)

Political Memes

5445 readers
3240 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

It's a tough needle to thread, because there is both a lot of antisemitism and a lot of opposition to genocide that is not motivated by antisemitism. Any support for Palestinians is joined by a chorus of calls to end the existence of Israel entirely, something that would require killing a lot of Jewish people. So it's difficult to untangle the legitimate criticism from the antisemitism.

So I don't disagree with you, but I also understand why people are quick to slap labels on critics.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Israel is not "Jewish people". Israel "could" end without a single Jew dying. Also, Jews lived there when it was Palestine. I dunno did they die when it became Israel? How are you arriving at the end of a concept being mass murder?

I think if Israel stopped trying to run itself as an ethnostate they'd be fine. I think there's an argument that the "concept" of what currently constitutes Israel may be too tainted to realistically save. Many unwilling to admit fault, apologize, and return what was stolen. And many unwilling to forgive them for doing it. It would take real concession and change. Something those in charge don't want. So the people both Israeli and Palestinian will continue to suffer for the gains of wealthy genocidal bigots.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Many Palestinians were killed or died in the transition when Israel was established.

I agree with you that Israel needs to change, and that they aren't going to change unless they are forced to change. But the Jewish people living in Israel will not leave peacefully. To "end" Israel is to kill a lot of Jewish people living there.

And the antisemites are counting on everyone making a distinction between the two.

[–] DeadHorseX@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

There's no scenario, in any possible world, in which the 'abolition' of Israel doesn't result in the deaths of millions of Jews.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (13 children)

There is a difference between possible and likely. And you my friend are misrepresenting the two. It is 100% possible. But it also is unlikely because of all the genocidal ethno statists.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Well, at least absent a secular awakening in the middle east. And that is the real issue here in my view, and I'm not sure why so many people seem to be giving a pass to the extremist elephant in the room here.

[–] orrk@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

there are many worlds where the abolition of Israel wouldn't result in the deaths of Jewish people, unless you swallow the fascist dichotomy of "Israel is the only safe place for Jews" and "Israel is inherently in danger, due to group X"

[–] S_204@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Israel "could" end without a single Jew dying

The history of this region proves this to not be the case though. Jews have mostly been chased out of the region a few times with many dead left in the wake.

Jews did not live peacefully before the British mandate ended, there's a long list of pogroms and assaults leading to many dead in the hundreds of years leading up to the UN establishment of the state.

It would be great if they could live peacefully but history shows that's a risk they can't take.

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 21 points 10 months ago (22 children)

Fuck that. Anti Zionism isn't antisemitism. Israel is a fascist state with no right to exist. Anyone who associates that fascist state to Jewishness is the true antisemite

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fjUGC8g4GOE&pp=ygUPbWFzayBvZmYgZnV0dXJl

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] nobloat@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago (12 children)

If you see a beaten up homeless person in the street and they keep screaming something about "I'm gonna take over the united States government", the threat is basically idle and has to be taken in the context of what power he has, as a homeless perspn, as compared to a state like the US. Israel has all the power and is in no kind of substantial danger from Hamas or anyone else. It can erradiacte the entire place easily. Palestine is the homeless person screaming how he wants to replace biden while in fact he is beaten to the ground and survives on scrapes of food.

[–] DoomBot5@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Here is a thought. Set a 60 second timer, see how fast you can reach a shelter within that timer. Now imagine that at the end of the timer rockets may or may not strike your home or your family's home. Are okay with that? Remember that 60 second timer can go off at any moment, including your commute to work.

That's what you're calling an "idle threat" that Israelis are presented with constantly.

[–] RainfallSonata@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Remember that 60 second timer can go off at any moment, including your commute to work.

That's more warning than Americans get when some rando decides to shoot up a shopping mall....or a school...or a sports stadium...or the highway on the commute to work. As if no one else in the world is subject to that kind of threat....

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There is no government on earth the US would allow to exist if it regularly sent terrorists into schools, sports stadiums, or highways on the commute to work.

So yes, great analogy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] steakmeout@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It’s not difficult at all. One is criticising government policies and extremists while the other is just bigotry using criticism of an entire people for their government policies and extremists.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

So how do you tell a critic's motivations? How do you separate the two when they are chanting in the streets?