this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
952 points (91.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35884 readers
1247 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Google search failed to even find a hollywood movie, even after 1 hour of attempts. I don't really care about the movie, but I am terrified by the prospect that google now ceased to function on this basic level. Why is this happening?

I understand the explanations of seo and other stuff like spam content. But why are there NO relevant results at all.

I wouldn't mind having to start wading through results at page 2 or even 10 but now it utterly fails to find even the most basic things.

Things you found on the first attempt even just a year ago. Now they are effectively hidden.

To me functionally the entire internet has now vanished. I cannot access anything that I am searching for. Might as well not exist at all.

Has anybody found a way around this?

Is this on purpose? Is this an attack on the free internet, herding people to just the top 5 sites like facebook, youtube, tiktok, and so forth?

Are there search engines that still work?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 127 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

The last part of your comment sounds like an ad straight out of those overlong YT videos.

[–] FlatFootFox@lemmy.world 64 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Have Brands™ started astroturfing Lemmy yet?

I’m not completely sold on Kagi yet. I’m still in the trial period right now. But paid services can be a tough sell online. I figured I’d be up front about the costs rather than wait for the inevitable “$10 a month for search!?” comment.

[–] ericisshort@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

I haven’t seen any obvious astroturfing yet, but your last paragraph really did have the vibe of a smoothly transitioned paid promotion. Not saying it was, but even the comments that you haven’t fully bought into it made it feel even more like one of the more honest paid promotions.

[–] berkeleyblue@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I read this same sentiment two days ago; Google doesn’t work for me.

Not sure what they are on about. I can find things I‘m looking for on Google in under a Minute 9 out of 10 times and I tend to use it quite heavily tbh…

[–] 9bananas@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

if you're searching for something general, like, i dunno "dishwasher cleaner" or something, it spits out usable results.

but as soon as a query becomes technical in nature, like troubleshooting IT problems, it's a straight up nightmare.

the reason it's so bad at searching for anything very specific is their attempt to "figure out what you really mean":

and google does that by... ignoring what you typed and changing your search prompt behind the scenes without telling you and without any options to change it.

and putting it in quotes rarely improves searches anymore, only spits out more garbage.

point is: google is basically dead for any specific searches and only really works for searches that amount to "i want to buy thing. show me thing."

[–] diannetea@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I had this weird hardware issue with my desktop and I could not find results for it on Google about a year ago, and I had searched for it a bunch of times previously as well and couldn't find anything relevant. My boyfriend searched for it on Google on his computer and found a result with the information we needed and i immediately fixed it.

Guessing my "custom" results were poisoned by something at some time, but it prevented me from finding the answer I needed, and I didn't think to log out at the time.

Super done with Google tbh

[–] bravemonkey@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

I signed up for Kagi after the trial. I'm very subscription adverse, but this one was something I don't mind paying for.

[–] Steve@communick.news 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

It's great that DDG doesn't track a users searches. It really is.
But at the end of the day, it's still just another ad platform profiting off of companies trying to sell you things.
And here you are complaining it seems like an ad, when someone's explaining an alternative ad-free search.
Just think about that for a moment.

[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Also, if we're being frank, DDG's results are damn near useless half the time.

It's like the opposite end of the SEO spectrum. Whereas Google just anchors onto certain keywords to regurgitate the same 4 listacles, DDG just sees your input for "my lawnmower won't start" and responds with "lawnmower huh? I dunno here's the history of John Deere or some shit, fuck off".

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I tried using DDG but had even worse results than Google is having right now. I wish it was good, but my multi month trial of it was not impressive.

It was especially bad for programming. At least Google still finds what I need for that

[–] _pete_@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hard disagree with that, DDG searches are accurate about 90% of the time that I use it (which as a web dev is quite a lot) if they aren’t hitting Google with the same term rarely wields any better results.

[–] governorkeagan@lemdro.id 3 points 10 months ago

I've had the same experience as you. The vast majority of the time, I can get the results that I want.

[–] ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago

It also doesn't allow you to actually exclude keywords. Which can be utterly infuriating if you're looking for a specific entry in a franchise or a lesser used definition of something.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's just handing your search off to Bing, and Microsoft just does what it does.

[–] Steve@communick.news 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

DDG pays Bing to use their API. DDG makes money by placing ads in the results. They do it kind of circularly using Microsoft's ad system, but they are separate.