1211

I think most all of us here on Lemmy are people with technical background. Most of my professional contacts remained using Reddit, Twitter and even excited when Threads launched.

If you are non-tech background, please comment and share what you do for life.

If you have tech background, upvote this to help promote this post so that we can find more non-tech users on Lemmy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AttackBunny@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago

Eh, it's still required to work on cars/engines. Thankfully we work on smaller vehicles (Mazda/Nissan mostly) and not some big ass diesel stuff.

I can "engineer" my way out of most situations, and have been very successful accomplishing things that many men can't, because they can't "think outside the box". What I mean by that is that I have to approach things differently. I have to understand things more completely sometimes, so I can work my way around the lack of brute force, where many men can just push/lift/torque something without thought, and they get complacent. That allows me to see different solutions to things that may stump others.

That said, I have found instances where I am just not physically big, or strong enough to do something, and need help.

I also have the benefit of being much smaller, so I can get into places a lot of men can't. It has its benefits and drawbacks.

[-] mrmanager 2 points 11 months ago

I believe you, and I have many examples from my own life where girls are outsmarting guys because they are forced to use their brains. Guys sometimes doesn't because we can just use strength instead, like you said.

And being smaller and more agile is a huge plus in most situations as well.

Pretty much agree 100%.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

Man I'm so glad that zoomers understand the difference between sex and gender, and are doing away with this, "boys do this, and girls do that!" bullshit.

Like, oh yeah, do you know a lot of girls who are, in your mind, uncharacteristically smart? That right? That's not condescending in any way.

[-] mrmanager 1 points 11 months ago

I don't know anyone who would say "uncharacteristically smart" like that. Sounds very offensive.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

I agree. Maybe you shouldn't imply it then.

[-] mrmanager 1 points 11 months ago

I didn't. Maybe you shouldn't read things that aren't there.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

Maybe you're just oblivious, but that's exactly what you implied. That "girls" "outsmarting boys" is something novel to you.

[-] mrmanager 1 points 11 months ago

I'm amazed you are reading that into what I said. Seems more likely you want to pick a fight with someone. But I have no interest in that, so let's just stop here. :)

this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
1211 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

42432 readers
1263 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS