124
'Do not, for the love of God, tell kids that slavery was beneficial'
(www.rawstory.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
124 points (100.0% liked)
United States | News & Politics
1635 readers
396 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It wasn't though, even for them. It made them dumber and their society less prosperous and resilient. The North didn't win because they were morally in the right (they were), but because slavery is inherently less productive.
It made the southern states more prosperous... IF you exclude black people from the definition of people, which is what slavery did.
IF you exclude black people and also the majority of white people (i.e. everybody who wasn't a member of the planter class), you mean.
Pretty sure the south lost because of the 3:1 soldier advantage, and besides Lee the North had all the best military leaders and experience. Some say the industrial output of the north mattered more, but truth is the south had plenty of weapons but no people to use them.
There's certainly debate about that. And that's the exact discussion you want to see occuring as that's what teaches critical thinking.
So yes, you should be discussing the beneficial aspects of slavery.