this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
373 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4439 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 52 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

The hydra feeds upon its many heads, hurting itself in the confusion but somehow does not die

Can the Republicans just have their party schism already? The MAGA crowd took over the RNC leadership years ago, just admit it and make a new party - or better yet clean house and oust them from your ranks.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because anyone thinking of leaving the RNC understands how the game is rigged for them and the DNC, and any new party has pretty much no chance. And they also know that if they kicked the crazies out (if they even could), the only thing left of the party would be a husk. The crazy base is their power source right now.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Agreed that the entrenched duopoly is no accident, but we also don’t have a Federalist party anymore either. The popular support eroded beneath them due to poor policy choices/outcomes, and that faction was politically homeless for years, and decades before they formed a new and coherent party structure with longevity. Which itself was enabled by the patronage and spoils that soured voters on the Jeffersonian-Democrats.

Adapt or die, it’s no different in biology or politics

[–] ech@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

To be clear, I'm not saying it can't happen (and it seems like it will eventually), but nobody in either half is surviving that split, and they know it. They're stuck with each other as they careen off this cliff.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

I suspect that this is still the future, but it's hard to know when it will actually happen. They've gone extreme enough that a lot of people are looking for the next conservative party.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The Libertarian Party has about 700,000 members and is on the ballot in all 50 states. I've been imagining a hostile takeover for some time.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (3 children)

That would be hilarious. If there's one thing most Americans seem to be able to agree on, it's that libertarians aren't worth voting for.

[–] Iampossiblyatwork@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Most Americans have voted for a democrat since 2004. So that's probably true.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Even Republicans won't vote for Libertarians.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

Right wing groups have subsidized and aided the Libertarians and Green Party for years. They know that GOP voters will stick with the Party, and that Left folks can be persuaded to try something new.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I've always thought a Libertarian is just a Republican trying to sleep with a Democrat - or vice versa.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

A Republican that smokes weed.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They're already clearly a coalition party as evidenced by the speaker elections and budget votes.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago

Nah a coalition is people voluntarily working together on purpose. The present day Republican Party is a hostage scenario - the moderates might want out, but don’t dare leave the fundraising & media machine behind if they do escape