1145
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

In an interview with the Guardian from his home base in Burlington, Vermont, Sanders urged the Democratic president to inject more urgency into his bid for re-election. He said that unless the president was more direct in recognising the many crises faced by working-class families his Republican rival would win.

“We’ve got to see the White House move more aggressively on healthcare, on housing, on tax reform, on the high cost of prescription drugs,” Sanders said. “If we can get the president to move in that direction, he will win; if not, he’s going to lose.”

The US senator from Vermont added that he was in contact with the White House pressing that point. “We hope to make clear to the president and his team that they are not going to win this election unless they come up with a progressive agenda that speaks to the needs of the working class of this country.”

Sanders’ warning comes at a critical time in American politics. On Monday, Republicans in Iowa will gather for caucuses that mark the official start of the 2024 presidential election.

Biden faces no serious challenger in the Democratic primaries. But concern is mounting over how he would fare against Trump given a likely rematch between them in November.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 127 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Unless the Trump is held accountable, He will most likely win. People's material needs are important and Dem messaging has basically been hey we showed this graph so you're not struggling and anything popular you want won't happen. But everything bad will happen with the other guy. Being not Trump once again is a dangerous way to win the election. Trump's cultist ass should be getting crushed.

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 65 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Trump's cultist ass should be getting crushed.

Makes me wonder what might have happened if the DNC hadn't f**ked Bernie over, twice.

[-] badbytes@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

Yeah, the DNC f-ing unknowingly gave that blowhard dictator his platform.

[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 13 points 5 months ago

Very explicitly knowingly *

*FTFY.

Democrats will suspend the constitution THEMSELVES before they go against our corporate overlords and run someone like Bernie.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Unknowingly? They would rather have Trump than Bernie ruining their two party corruption. The DNC won in 2016.

[-] metalsonic00@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

They didnt care. DNC would rather lose with Hillary/Biden then win with Bernie.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 5 months ago

It hurts me to think how much better a position we would be in right now if they hadn't worked so hard to marginalize him.

Imagine how many lives would have been saved on just the pandemic disinformation alone.

And Bernie would have absolutely demolished cheetolini in the debates.

[-] DrPop@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

I still remember trying to explain to someone back in my reddit days that many media sources played clips of people saying they are voting for Biden in the primaries because they believe Bernie would lose. The only places saying that were the same media sources.

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 7 points 5 months ago
[-] Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 5 months ago

Which is why I am a very vocal advocate for eating the rich. They can own all they want inside my belly.

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Rich people would be getting richer slower and the world would be a better place.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 5 months ago

It still blows my mind he wasn't taken into custody for sedition ON Jan 6th.

I think future historians will point to that as a major turning point in our nation's decline.

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

Taking a sitting president into custody without impeachment when he is not an immediate threat would be a coup, which I imagine would be worse for democracy, though maybe not for america.

[-] Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 months ago

Pretty sure the final outcome of letting donny spray tan go with zero consequences is going to be him winning the last election our country ever has, so pardon me if I don't agree with you that taking a sitting president into custody is more of a problem than a legit dictator being allowed to run for office.

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

No point worrying about Trump desteoying democracy if you destroy it yourself first. Its not like you can't stop an insurrectionist from running for office legally without violating the constitution and laws by taking him into custody.

[-] Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 months ago

In a less corrupt world I would say that peaceful protests are a legal way to keep him out of office but we all know cop hypocrisy and the right wing media machine will spin it just like they did for all the George Floyd protests.

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 5 points 5 months ago

i think it's more of a milestone. we haven't actually changed trajectory at all.

[-] Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 5 months ago

As someone active in politics since the late 80s, I can say we have certainly lost a number of our civil liberties, fascists feel emboldened enough to go full masks-off on the floor of Congress, and we just had a fucking soft coup attempt, so yea our trajectory has been on the downward side of parabolic since Ragass Reagan was allowed to ooze into the white house.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

Biden really needs to understand how unpopular he is. Not that he will, but I can dream.

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

I really don't want another run of Trump pardoning psychopaths and doing what he wants. But democracy is basically in the hands of Dems and they scrap by when it comes to connecting with people or even giving them a vision post beating Trump.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 months ago

The only way Trump is "connecting" with people is by telling them grandiose lies and making impossible promises.

Annoyingly, a shitton of people are willing to go along with those lies without thinking about it or questioning anything.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 months ago

Sure he's unpopular with progressives and the youth.

Most blue voters are older people more interested in the status quo and in any other country with a sane Overton window would be called conservatives.

And the idealism of youth can easily convince them that a 3rd party vote is a meaningful protest against the DNC's lack of progressive action.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 months ago

Biden won't win without progressives and youth. Pandering to the center is how you lose. Trump won bc he did not play to the center.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] time_lord@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

By progressive and youth, you mean millennials, right? Who are as old as.... 40.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] anarchy79@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

I have been pre-emptively severely depressed for this.

[-] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

It's kinda crazy since, what will the other wlsode do to help? There is a strong history of actively harming everyone but the ultra rich.

It's like being mad at my boss because he isn't telling me how he's going to help me on my career progression, and deciding I'll switch bosses to a corrupt prison guard instead.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago

The danger isn't dems voting R.

It's poor turnout.

And when poor turnout happens, Republicans win.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mockernicholas@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Unfortunately the way I see it is Biden will lose for two reasons:

  1. Hes old af
  2. Inflation

Regardless of policies or how terrible the alternative is. I dont think most people are going to think much past "Things are expensive now, and oh great a super old white dude".

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 months ago

Love how they can blame inflation on Joe Brandon, but they refused to blame 45 for anything for 4 years.

[-] mockernicholas@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Different types of people. Its a shame Democrats have such an uphill battle to rally around candidates because those voters hold their leaders accountable, almost to a fault. The republican voter base is made of people who are basically in a cult, or are one issue voters.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Love how they can blame inflation on Joe Brandon, but they refused to blame 45 for anything for 4 years.

Because the Dems were not yelling that from the rooftops like they should have been, so perception is set as that it's Biden's fault.

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Inflation started under Trump and Trump is just as old

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Inflation started under Trump and Trump is just as old

That's not the perception though.

[-] Rusticus@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Why is that the perception?

Hint: Corps are at record high profits as is wealth inequality.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (52 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
1145 points (98.1% liked)

News

21693 readers
4438 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS