this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
88 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37746 readers
524 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's DALL-E. DALL-E is different than Stable Diffusion, which is different from Midjourney, which is different from the many NAI anime models out there.

We need to stop treating LD models like they are all the same thing. Models are based on the data they are trained on. Sure, a lot of them started out from a Stable Diffusion model, but that's not always the case, and enough training can have them go off in specialized directions.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Either I am blind or comment OP doesnt mention SD nor any other specific model.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The pictures in your embedded widget on your post say "Unterstützt von DALL-E 3". Also, the very start of the article says "When Melissa Heikkilä tried Lensa’s Magic Avatars", which uses Stable Diffusion, but I'm not sure if they further trained it themselves.

The point is that "Lensa’s Magic Avatars" isn't all of AI, and clickbait titles like this needs to stop treating it like that. It's the latent diffusion equivalent of this.