this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
438 points (95.2% liked)

Science Memes

10885 readers
4087 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 41 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

I kept looking at that too. It's crazy to me that there are only 2 cycles in the graph and one is the big accidental one. It honestly makes me think that either something must be wrong with the data, or it's reflective of some deep principle of math or sexuality (e.g. that people won't fuck around within their close social grouping nearly as readily as they will with people on the outskirts of it).

[–] jnplch@discuss.tchncs.de 51 points 9 months ago

The authors wrote that they were surprised too and went back to talk to the students and apparently there was an unwritten rule that you don’t date the ex of the new partner of your ex. So if Bob and Alice split up and Alice starts dating Ben, then Bob should not date Ben’s ex Alison.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I've spotted five cycles.

  1. The big boy.
  2. Six member cycle at the top of the big boy.
  3. Four member cycle with that guy who slept with nine girls.
  4. A second cycle with that same guy.
  5. That three way over to the right.

It's possible there's more but I'm pretty sure that's it.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Aaaahhh got it. So the whole issue was my lack of paying attention. Makes sense.

[–] Jimbob0i0@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Also feels weird there's only one same gender connection (female to female) as far as I could see in that whole thing...

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 9 months ago

There's a male-male one on the rightward branch of the ring structure.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago

There's also a male male in the left side of the ring