this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
42 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22766 readers
443 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
quartz242@hexbear.net
replaceable@hexbear.net
VILenin@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net
42
If the CIA just decides who wins an election based on the interests of the ruling class, why didn't Hilary win 2016? (hexbear.net)
submitted 10 months ago by tombruzzo@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net
36 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I've seen discussions on here about Biden winning this year because he works in the ruling class's interest.

If the CIA really did just push a button at Langley and decide the next president, why not Hilary?

She's a corporate ghoul like the rest of them, loves war, everyone expected her to win, and the election was close enough to be plausible either way. She would have been a more reliable, or at least knowable, asset to the deep state than Trump.

She would have been the same mid president as Trump, but it would have been more of a banality of evil approach. Everyone's material conditions would have gotten worse in the same way but there wouldn't have been the media circus around everything she did.

So why do you think the 'most qualified' person for the job didn't win last time? And what could that say about this year?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I’ve read part of Inventing Reality is covers similar topics, although not exclusively about CIA relationships with the media. I’ll check it out

[–] voight@hexbear.net 1 points 9 months ago

It calls people out with amazing accuracy in a way that is unfortunately even more relevant decades later. People are just aggregating the CIA patronage ppl he refers to into an influencer reality show rock tumbler for brains :3 have fun