this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
42 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22767 readers
374 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I saw some people on Reddit discussing whether someone was being orientalist, and I agreed they were simply by using the phrase "zen-like concentration". I'm not offended by them using this term, I just find it stupid. "Zen-like" has absolutely no meaning, but gives an air of eastern spirituality and mysticism. I personally think you should only be able to use that phrase if you can give a detailed and verifiable explanation about the differences between zen-like concentration, huayan-like concentration, mahasthabir nikaya-like concentration, and chan-like concentration, as well as recognize that the last one is exactly the same as zen.

And why is it only ever "zen-like"? I'm sure everyone would find it strange if Asians suddenly started to use the terms "seventh day adventism-like" or "independent fundamentalist baptist-like" to refer to the elements of American culture they find exotic.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] RatzChatsubo@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think you are not taking into account that Zen Buddhism has become a popular thing in the West. It's basically quick and easy Buddhism without all the work and just saying things are zen is more like a shortcut than it is a derogatory term

[โ€“] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 6 points 9 months ago

it's not meant to be derogatory, but the lazy shortcut is orientalist