195
submitted 5 months ago by BlanK0@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 42 points 5 months ago

Cool, but is copy path to file a thing yet?

[-] RoboRay@kbin.social 36 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Copy the file and paste it into anywhere you can enter text... you get the path to the file as text.

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yay, basic features needing weird workarounds!

Edit: it seems like it, but we were wrong. You dont need a filepath, you can literally copy the file and paste it to a

  • Browser
  • Terminal
  • Editor
  • ...

Can someone give me a situation where you cant paste a file and it inserts the filepath instead?

[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I'm on KDE, how does KDE do it better?

On dolphin, you right click on it and than there is "copy path to file" button

[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

How is it better if you are going to paste it anyway? I mean, on GNOME you would have to just copy the file, instead of the two clicks on KDE.

Am I missing something?

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 4 points 5 months ago

This works in Dolphin/KDE too, actually same workflow as on Windows. I just find it very strange to do that, but as you are saying that, I suppose as on Unix everything is a file, copying a file to a location that cant handle the file is just like copying the filepath!

Boom, blew my silly KDE mind. I think you are right, in most situations you can just copy-paste the actual file, as you only need file paths where the file cannot be pasted anyways.

[-] fushuan@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This might work sometimes, but some other times you are dealing with a program that deals in files and text and you want the path itself, for example, to send the path of a file in a shared mounted disk to a colleague/friend through slack /discord/telegram/teams. All of those will try to send the file itself instead of the path I would want to send.

Furthermore, idk how that interacts within a VM environment, for example when you have a work computer and you need to connect into a gnome based remote desktop environment, will the shared clipboard act nicely? That's way too many variables and prone to errors, an option to copy path is just simpler.

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 2 points 5 months ago

True. I suppose this is a useful feature

[-] fushuan@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

If for some reason you paste a file in telegram/slack/discord/teams, it tries to send the file, so I have no way of sending the path to the file (which might be on a shared device) to someone unless I paste it in a text editor first and then copy the text.

[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

That's a very logical use case. Are there any keyboard modifiers you could use? Maybe pasting with CTRL+SHIFT+V for example?

[-] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 7 points 5 months ago

I should try that thanks!
Though I still believe that UX would benefit from such a button, there's a Nautilus extension for it as well chr314/nautilus-copy-path, I think it deserves to be native

[-] sv1sjp@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

++ as well as searching on a folder simply by the first letter, without searching everywhere

[-] galmuth@feddit.uk 13 points 5 months ago

They intentionally removed this feature years ago. It was possible to reenable via a dconf setting for a while but I believe that was also eventually removed.
So annoying.

[-] drz@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago

It's absolutely insanity that this feature was removed. I stopped using Nautilus because of this.

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Agree. I can understand GNOME not supporting infinite settings and customization, but since when are Linux users noobs?

People using GNOME either never edited a Desktop entry, entered a manual path or did anything poweruser related, or they use 3rd party apps or do everything in the terminal.

I dont get how a Linux Desktop can have so little support for anything.

Needing extensions to restore basic features is not good UX. Like a clipboard manager, blurry shell, appindicators? Why?

[-] fushuan@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

The only reason I use gnome is because the window dragging has a weird flicker with KDE and nvidia cards. In gnome it's way smoother. That and the pressing the super button for the fancy window animation, that one is really nice. I could live without the fancy animation (or with whatever KDE replacement that I'm sure it's good enough) if the driver issue wasn't a thing, though.

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 2 points 5 months ago

Yes KDE has something similar and you can remap it with a command. TheLinuxExperiment had this for krunner once, its probably possible.

GNOME is really nice in what it does. Simply that it doesnt do enough for me. There are cool extensions and I feel the community is just way bigger. The animations, dash to panel, blur my shell, make it very cool.

Just the lack of so much like powerful apps is a nogo

[-] Doods@infosec.pub 3 points 5 months ago

++ Compact view (as Nemo calls it)

[-] BlanK0@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago

Not sure 🤔, I have been using a lot ranger lately

[-] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 2 points 5 months ago

Ranger is amazing, I never thought to use it as my default file manager

[-] yianiris@kafeneio.social 1 points 5 months ago
[-] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This Worker? That's interesting, though it's not really to my taste

[-] beeng@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 months ago

Try "lf". It's ranger written in go. == lots faster.

[-] BlanK0@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

Although it doesn't have as many features out of the box, you have to setup some stuff.

[-] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 months ago

Luckily if you need that feature, you can just download a different file manager. This is why I hate monopolies and love Linux and the FOSS community.

[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

Aside from ios, I don't know of anywhere that has a monopoly on file managers

[-] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago

It's not just file managers that enjoy monopolies though. Often there is an industry standard software that people are essentially locked into, like Adobe. It seems like they're pushing unwanted features lately, but people have to just suck it up.

this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
195 points (98.5% liked)

Linux

45595 readers
669 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS