this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
266 points (96.8% liked)
Funny: Home of the Haha
5765 readers
1325 users here now
Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.
Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Other Communities:
-
/c/TenForward@lemmy.world - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/Memes@lemmy.world - General memes
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
We need to get rid of them, they cost us nothing, we have thousands. But we can't make them free or give them to children. = Capitalism
Crazy how it probably never even crossed their minds
That's not even capitalism. That's just dumb greed. Capitalism is ruled by supply and demand. They have an oversupply with no demand. If they have thousands taking up valuable storage space, they should be free or they should be incurring the lesser expense of disposing them in the local landfill/recycling center.
Or its a lie and the discount price really has a healthy profit in it
Oh thank god.
You're probably right, but there are reasons why one might list a nominal price, but not actually collect payment.
I've listed things on Craiglist for a small price but not collected the money. With free items, "buyers" can be more flaky, and I don't want to deal with that
but by placing a small price, people seemed better at showing up to pick stuff up on time, etc. So, list a price, and then reverse bait and switch when they arrive to pick up item and give it away.
For these, I could imagine wanting them to go to a good home. With no price, you may get frat house pranks, etc., so a small price gets people who are actually interested.
Or...yeah, you're probably right.
Plus they only kill 5 minutes yet cost $2!? What kind of swanky neighborhood is this in, that people can afford to prolly give their kids cancer for $2 (EACH!), without at least dulling the hunger sensation for 5 minutes first?
Yup, seems like dumb shit my wife would buy for the kids. I'm sure she'd even pay double that.