this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
823 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18821 readers
4974 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ispanicus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Why would everyone be working 40 hours? The whole point of the study is that they reduced working hours to 32 hours a week without loss in pay.

[–] lynny@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Logistics mainly. There's tons of jobs that you cannot just throw more people at to accomplish something, especially in complex manufacturing.

I also don't see how you get paid the same if you're taking 6 hours off. I don't bring congress can mandate private companies to increase wages (other than minimum), and even if they did, businesses will not give that elevated wage to any new hires, making it so people like me have to take a significant wage cut if we wanted to switch jobs.

I know office workers love to brag about how much money they make over bluecollar workers, but that doesn't mean it should ignore how legislation is going to affect people like us who don't have a nice bundle of cash to fall back on. That's how you get people like Trump and DeSantis.

[–] Ispanicus@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If any legislation was to happen, it would be to mandate the standard work week to 32 hours, so if a company wanted to have you for 40 they would have to pay overtime. This has happened several times in history already by the way (6 to 5 day work week and 12 to 8 hour work day), so I don't see how it would be any different.

Companies don't pay out of the goodness of their hearts, they pay what the market demands, so if they cannot get new hires at a certain salary, they will have to increase it.

[–] lynny@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would my company pay me overtime rather than telling me to go home after 32 hours? My wage will be cut, the only benefit I get is a better work life balance, but that doesn't mean much when I'll no longer be able to afford rent.

I remember people telling us here in the rust belt that bills like NAFTA would benefit us greatly by reducing the cost of living, yet 30 years later we're still suffering and being told to trust the same pencil pushers who promised not to screw us over last time.

Thankfully I don't see republicans letting this bill though. We've suffered enough of this economic experimentation.

[–] younity@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The same reason you said a 32 hour work week is impossible, "because manufacturing"

Why does overtime exist already? The question you are asking on the face is so asinine it barely merits a response.

[–] lynny@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I never said anything was impossible, I said it will be a logistical nightmare that will hurt working class people at the expense of office workers. I'm done engaging if you're going to intentionally take my comments out of context. Good day.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)