358
submitted 4 months ago by CMake to c/facepalm@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] polysics@lemmy.world 72 points 4 months ago

So what if it's two men? Or two women?

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 45 points 4 months ago

Typically, the one doing the penetrating is charged. Not always, there are cases of heterosexual rape where the woman is the aggressor. These posters are from a not-too-distant past where only men raped only women. If it was 2 guys, it was just weird gay stuff. Girl was the aggressor...guy should feel lucky. 2 girls; "nice."

[-] Malfeasant@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Girl was the aggressor...guy should feel lucky.

And if he didn't, he must be gay. Yeah, those were harsh words for a 15 year old in 1990...

[-] Wahots@pawb.social 33 points 4 months ago

Index out of bounds exception

[-] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 28 points 4 months ago

Well, clearly with two men they raped each other. Two women, no crime.

[-] Oaksey@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

But if the men can consent but the women can't...

[-] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

It's not about consent, it's about penis bad. Really, though, it goes either way.

[-] TheFriar@lemm.ee 23 points 4 months ago

The universe collapses in on itself, turning into a supermassive ultrablack hole

[-] solomon42069@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

I believe that's in the Bible.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Then the manliest one is charged. If no man is found there is no crime

[-] bitwaba@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago
[-] ferralcat@monyet.cc 4 points 4 months ago

I don't think these were legally binding posters. I'm not sure you'd get super far if even one person was drunk in court, unless they were literally blackout drunk and you had video evidence of it (or you were black of course).

this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
358 points (88.9% liked)

Facepalm

2325 readers
92 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS