Programmer Humor

19594 readers

588 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

924

submitted 9 months ago by nifty@lemmy.world to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

167 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Emacs unfortunately uses Emacs lisp, not common lisp or scheme.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There was that one attempt to rewrite Emacs in cl

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And that didn't work? I would have thought it would be quite popular.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think that Emacs itself was mostly implemented, but they couldn't get people to rewrite all of their user generated content.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Oh, right. That makes sense.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What are the main differences?

[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Emacs is a bunch older than common lisp.

One of its more idiosyncratic design decisions was using dynamic scope, rather than lexical scope. They did add in per-file lexical scope, though.

It also just doesn't implement a lot of common lisp's standard library.