366
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 15 points 4 months ago
[-] protist@mander.xyz 34 points 4 months ago

Letitia James just said the other day she'll seize his real estate if she has to

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

You'll have to Lysol the crap out of those buildings. Blegh!

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 13 points 4 months ago

im curious to know what happens when he doesnt pay. can they go after all assets, including those not in new york?

[-] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago

To my knowledge, New York can seize assets in NY and lien everything else.

I could be wrong tho.

[-] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

In a normal civil case once judgment has entered you receive an execution, which allows you to seize property in the state.

In order to seize property in another state you would have to domesticate the judgment in the new state, then get an execution from that state to seize property. Domestication of a judgment is typically straightforward and simple, but it depends upon the state, some are more arduous than others.

[-] Oisteink@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Ianal - but I believe you can’t get a re-trial if you don’t submit the money or a bond. So somebody is going to pay it, even if they have to use rubles or diamonds

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 9 points 4 months ago

its the appeal process that cannot begin until theres some bond posted thats a decent percentage, if not all of it. plus interest.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It is 125% of the total judgement.

[-] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 months ago

It depends on the jurisdiction. In some there is some judicial discretion. I saw a case where the amount was 111.1%. I am not admitted in New York and am too lazy to look up their rules. Usually the amount is enough to pay the whole judgment plus all costs (which shouldn't be a very high percentage of such a huge judgment, lol).

One of my clients deposited the judgment amount plus court ordered costs in cash in an escrow account of the Court pending the appeal. The prevailing party received the judgment plus the interest the deposit earned (like an IOLTA).

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Michael Popok from Meidas Touch said it was 125% in NY. That's where I got that figure from. I find him to generally be pretty reliable.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 2 points 4 months ago

It can be reduced, but there is no good reason to do so here.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

Sure, it's gonna get paid, by the Republican party and their donors (and maybe an oligarch or Crown Prince too).

Just not DJT. And why would he? If you can get rubes and dictators to pay, you might as well.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 8 points 4 months ago

NY doesn't care.

Ms. James has already said that NY will seize his buildings one by one and auction them off until the debt is paid.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

He could just set up fake auctioneers to raise the prices to crazy values and pay off the fine with Russian backed money?

this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
366 points (97.9% liked)

politics

18082 readers
3082 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS