this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
160 points (100.0% liked)
politics
22274 readers
213 users here now
Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.
Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.
Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.
!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.
Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.
Off topic posts will be removed.
Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Oh, that's actually the cleverest bit, what keeps the whole enterprise running smoothly.
Running a restaurant, even one with the presence of McDonald's, is just not a particularly great business model. Costs, food labor maintenance ect, are high and profit is on average slim, prone to wild fluctuations. The real money is made in being the source of the costs, providing produce and meat, machinery and rental space. So, for nearly all of the company's history, McDonald's Corporation®(MCD) just doesn't bother with the restaurant end of things.
Franchisee
is just corporate-speak forbag-holder
. In exchange for the profits of doing restaurant, the owner assumes all the actual risk of the enterprise. If it fails, it's own their head. (MCD) will still be there to rent the building and deliver patties to the next schmuck. If it turns out the location just isn't feasible? Liquidate it! It's all loss minimization.