this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
1002 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2805 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] justhach@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (4 children)

America, what is you doing? Get your legal drining age to a reasonable age first FFS.

A 14 year old can serve alcohol for seven years before they're legally allowed to drink any? Thats fucked.

[–] totallynotarobot@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's your issue? Not that 14 year olds shouldn't be working in bars, where hours interfere with school and growing brains properly, and pervs get pervier as they get drunker? Not that child labour is bad?

[–] justhach@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can I not be upset at both? Not sure how what I said seemed like an approval of 14yo working in bars, but go off.

[–] LethalSmack@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It’s cause the drinking age is such a benign issue compared to child labor.

It’s serves as a distraction from the main issue at hand.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think you worded it well then. You said "get a reasonable drinking age first". The first there implies that it's ok to have children working in bars as long as it comes after lowering the drinking age.

[–] Chee_Koala@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Is doesn't imply that for me at all, which indicates it might be a case of translation noise.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

The drinking age is fine. If anything, it should be raised to 25 so that older college kids can't buy booze for younger ones. Alcohol is a poison; let your brain finish developing first before you start abusing it. And before you call me a prude, I drink several times a week. (And smoke weed, of course.)

Like the other person said, you should be more concerned over the child labor issue. Bars already have issues with drunk assholes hitting on and groping servers; now imagine the server that is getting groped is your daughter who just barely entered high school.

State governments should instead provide incentives to business owners to pay their workers a livable wage, like tax credits and a higher minimum wage.

Furthermore, if a business cannot afford to pay it's lowest level employees a $40K salary ($19/hr; the bare minimum needed for the average American to afford a home and all the basic necessities), then their business model is unsustainable and they should shut down.

[–] ivenoidea@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would you also raise the age to join the military to 25? After all, someone whose brain isn’t developed fully shouldn’t be able to make the decision to go kill people at risk to their own life.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck yeah I would. Too many young people putting their lives at risk without realizing the consequences.

[–] ivenoidea@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Nice, then that we agree on. But it gets a bit more difficult.

Would you set the smoking age to 25 as well? Probably, since it’s so unhealthy. But then do we set fast food at age 25 as well? More people die of heart issues than anything else, and that’s mainly driven by the awful diet most people live on.

Should people under 25 be able to go into any sort of debt? If not, then that means fixing the education and healthcare systems (which seems like a good thing). But what if someone goes into debt to buy an apartment or house? Or even just a car? Having debt can be really bad for mental health, and depending on where you have it physical health as well.

If we keep thinking along those lines, do we allow people under 25 to watch TV and play video games? Both activities cause people to become very sedentary, which is bad for health as well.

Do we allow people under 25 to have desk jobs? But then along the same lines, do we allow people under 25 to have physical jobs? Both can negatively impact your body in different ways, and a undeveloped brain might not consider all the risks involved.

I’m not hating on you, I just think it’s interesting to consider just how far you would take that logic.

[–] threeduck@aussie.zone 11 points 1 year ago

I back NZ in their decision to ban cigarettes entirely. What a joyless drug to kill yourself with.

All of your other examples at least have some upside up em.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Land of the free with the minimum 25 year old drinking age.

Literally the only thing an American is free to do is buy an AR15.

[–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're forgetting voting, driving, getting married (unless you live in the red states where you can get forcibly married as a minor), and best of all, DEBT! ;)

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

That's the same for literally all of the EU and several other countries.

[–] Willer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Id wish my country would make the legal drinking age 16 so that... oh wait it already is XD

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

You don't learn to be responsible around alcohol by not having any access to it and then being able to buy hard liqour right away. The stories i heard both about college drinking and highschool drinking from people who spent a year in the US were both hilarious and frightening. In Germany teenagers can buy beer and wine with 16. Hard booze and sweet drinks, where you don't taste the alcohol are 18+. Most people are getting in touch with alcohol when they are 14-16 with their parents present. Having a glass of sparkling wine for new years, having a beer with their parents at birthdays etc.

This way people learn what they can and cannot take, how easy it is to get drunk on booze and how to look out for signs of having drunk too much. Without the criminal punishment, that the US loves to shove down peoples throat, they also feel safe to get help if someone is suspected of having alcohol poisoning.

[–] LambdaDuck@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

that’s why you have different drinking age and buying alcohol in a store age. for example where i live you can drink when you’re 18 (which is considered adult for all other purposes) and buy alcohol from a store when you’re 20.

what’s the usual age when people start drinking in the US? i’m assuming it’s way younger than the actual legal drinking age

[–] xX_fnord_Xx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Misread your question. Many people start drinking in the US well before it's legal. The horrible situations my friends got in to with seedy people to procure a case of shitty beer and some cigarettes were legion.

[–] xX_fnord_Xx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

21 to purchase in a bar or store. Kids under 21 can drink with their parents in attendance in some places. I think I remember a 16 year old could have a beer with their folks at a bar in Wisconsin, but that may have changed.

[–] Djtecha@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

Can go kill people over seas 3 years beforehand too. Our priorities are so fucked.

[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes but that was the compromise because even 13 is too young for Republicans to exploit children into working

They save them for marriage