this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
2989 points (99.9% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3419 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump has been charged by the Department of Justice with the following four counts:

  • A conspiracy to defraud the United States “by using dishonesty, fraud and deceit to obstruct the nation’s process of collecting, counting, and certifying the results of the presidential election,” according to the special counsel’s office.

  • A conspiracy to impede the Jan. 6 congressional proceeding at which the collected results of the presidential election are counted and certified.

  • A conspiracy against the right to vote and to have that vote counted.

  • Obstruction of, and attempt to obstruct and impede, the certification of the electoral vote.


In criminally charging former president Donald Trump for his efforts to reverse his 2020 election loss, federal prosecutors allege that Trump enlisted six co-conspirators to “assist him in his criminal efforts to overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election and retain power.”

  1. Rudy Giuliani

  2. John Eastman

  3. Sidney Powell

  4. Jeffrey Clark

  5. Kenneth Chesebro

  6. Unknown political consultant


Updated 8/3/2023 by Jordan Lund

Washington, D.C. - 4 felonies, January 6th Election Interference

Investigation

Indictment

Arrest <- You Are Here

(Lawyers have until 8/10 to submit requested trial dates, which will be announced on 8/28)

Trial

Conviction

Sentencing

Georgia - Election Interference

Investigation <- You Are Here

2 new grand juries were impaneled on 7/11/2023.

Indictment - July 11th to September 1st.

(Grand Jury work expected July 31 to Aug. 18)

Arrest

Trial

Conviction

Sentencing

New York State - 34 felonies, Stormy Daniels Payoff

Investigation

Indictment

Arrest <- You Are Here

Trial - March 25th, 2024

Conviction

Sentencing

Florida - 40 felonies, Federal documents charges

Investigation

Indictment

The original indictment was for 37 felonies.

3 new felonies were added on July 27, 2023.

Arrest <- You Are Here

Trial - May 20, 2024

Conviction

Sentencing


Other grand juries, such as for the documents at Bedminster, have not been announced.

The E. Jean Carroll trial for sexual assault and defamation, where Trump was found liable and ordered to pay $5 million before immediately defaming her again, resulting in a demand for $10 million, is not listed as it’s a civil case and not a criminal one.


Sources:


Trumps 3rd Indictment - Conspiring to Defraud the United States - 1 August 2023

NBC News: Grand jury charges Trump in 2020 election probe: Highlights

Vox: Trump was just indicted for trying to steal the 2020 election

CNN: August 1, 2023 Trump indicted in special counsel's 2020 election interference probe

Washington Post: Here are the Trump co-conspirators described in the DOJ indictment

Reason: Trump Indicted for Attempting To Overturn 2020 Presidential Election

FiveThirtyEight: All Of Trump's Indictments Could Seriously Bog Down His Campaign


Trump's Arraignment - 3 August 2023

AP: Trump is due to face a judge in DC over charges he tried to overturn the 2020 presidential election

C-SPAN: The Not Above the Law Coalition, a group of organizations in support of accountability for those who opposed certifying the 2020 election results, holds a press conference ahead of the arraignment of former President Donald Trump.

C-SPAN: Coverage of the arraignment of former President Trump, stemming from Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into election interference. The former president is facing four criminal charges, including conspiracy to defraud the United States.

CBS News: Trump pleads not guilty to federal charges in special counsel probe

Chicago Tribune: Trump pleads not guilty to federal charges that he tried to overturn the 2020 election

The Independent: Trump appears to stumble over his name and age at arraignment


Official Documentation

Read the indictment by @mateomaui@reddthat.com

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 78 points 1 year ago (12 children)

The "he won't face any consequences" crowd is getting just as good at moving goalposts as the MAGA crowd is.

"He won't be investigated".
"He won't be indicted".
"The trial will be delayed indefinitely".
"He won't be convicted".
"He won't actually see any jail time".

Who's side are you guys on anyway?

[–] Smallletter@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm one of those. I don't know if you realize or not, but there are a stupid number of examples of rich people commiting rather horrible crimes and never seeing jail.

I'm absolutely all for Trump facing consequences. But I'll believe it when I see it. This country is made for the rich.

[–] droans@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If he's convicted, he'll almost certainly face house arrest until his natural* death.

It's likely he would be killed in prison. The Justice Department would neither want to see him killed nor make him a martyr.

^(*These statements have not been approved by the FDA. Product may contain up to 99% processed ingredients.)

[–] Smallletter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's exactly the worst case scenario. he gets to do what he did and live to the end of his days in a cushy mansion . That ain't consequences.

[–] vagrantprodigy@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The goal has always been a cell. Anything less means he hasn't faced consequences. I'm not aware of anyone who believes he is guilty who would have been happy with an investigation or indictment that goes nowhere.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The only way he isn't going to face some time in jail is if he flees the county. He's facing 79 felony counts and only needs 1 for prison time. All I'm trying to say is just because he's not in jail yet it doesn't mean he won't go to jail. And that's the attitude a lot of people are pushing. "He won't go to jail" doesn't hold up when the same people said he wouldn't be investigated, then he was investigated. They said he won't be charged, then he was charged. The ball is rolling and picking up momentum now, and it will run his ass over. But just because it hasn't caught up to him yet doesn't mean that it won't.

[–] retrieval4558@mander.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

There's another way... If he's "elected" president / pardoned

[–] ryrybang@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Many, if not all, of the charges he faces across all three indictments have a punishment of a fine or jail time or both. So no, he doesn't need just one for prison time. He could easily get a slap on the wrist and pay a fine.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago

Who’s side are you guys on anyway?

Mostly the cynical side.

We want him to face consequences, but how often does that actually happen to wealthy people in the USA?

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm on the side where "we got him" has happened so many times without actual consequences that I've been numb for a long time. I'm feeling optimism that he might go down for the first time in ages.

It's only moving goalposts when it's outright denial of reality. When new information (failed attempts to nail the bastard) is taken into account, it's adjusting expectations.

[–] roboticide@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Exactly. Have we forgotten the impeachment already? And the second impeachment?

I'll believe Trump will actually go down for his crimes when we get a guilty sentence. There's still a long way to go between now and a jail time.

He may be able to delay until the election. Who knows what happens then.

He might win the election.

He may not be found guilty.

He might be found guilty and not do prison time.

He might be under home arrest and start an even more dangerous insurrection.

It's so stupid to ask what side we're on or accusing us of "moving goalposts." We're on the side of "Don't count our indicted chickens before they hatch."

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

The process has already been incredibly biased in his favor this entire time. The stuff he's facing charges over are things that you and I would already be sitting in a prison cell awaiting our trial for. He's being handled with kid gloves. Also look over how world leaders in the past are usually handled, even those that have committed heinous crimes like genocide and such, it's usually exile or house arrest. I'd be happy to be proven wrong, I would love nothing more than to be proven wrong and for him to face very real consequences, but somehow I doubt it.

[–] NixDev@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago

I am on the side that I hope he goes to jail. But with everything else that he has dodged I don't have high hopes. With these charges and the potential charges from Georgia I believe he should be disqualified from running for president. Now hopefully justice moves quickly for all of these cases

[–] starrox@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Let me give you my (non-US) perspective: The world has watched this monster stomp on every value a decent human might have for more than 5 years. We saw the things he got away with due to a brigade of lawyers (essentially money). We all know that money talks, worldwide, but especially in the US.

I have no faith in the US justice system doing the right thing anymore (if ever). So I'll believe it when I see it.

[–] PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As an American living in "Trump country" I don't know if things will be any better if he does get convicted. I don't think even other Americans living in the coastal areas fully understand just how big of a powder keg middle America is. The right spark in the right place and this whole country could go up before the end of the decade. I'm actively trying to move out because I fear for my safety in these next few years.

[–] starrox@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

That is so very sad to read. I wish you safety and wellbeing.

[–] PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm concerned that if he goes to jail, a bunch of his redcap loyalists will try and break him out. What they lack in critical thinking skills they make up for in numbers and firepower.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they couldn't do it on January 6th with Trump crippling capitol security, inside tours of the Senate and house, police cooperation, and removal of the panic buttons, they won't be able to accomplish it now either.

[–] PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It can be dangerous to assume your enemy does not learn from their failures.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

They're the Defeatist Brigade and they're everywhere.

I think it's a fear of getting their hopes up. Liberals have been pretty consistently disappointed by their party recently, so lots of people are afraid to even start hoping for improvement.

[–] letsgocrazy@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Some people have to complain about how bad things are - when things work the way they are supposed to these people get upset becuse cynicism is also a mask to hide lazy thinking.