this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2024
441 points (95.3% liked)

News

23267 readers
3066 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

During a presentation by an executive with Google’s Israel branch on Monday, a Google Cloud engineer stood up and shouted, “I refuse to build technology that powers genocide or surveillance.” They were later fired.

https://www.theverge.com/2024/3/8/24094687/google-israel-project-nimbus-employee-fired

@news

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 51 points 8 months ago (8 children)

I absolutely understand the sentiment of that engineer, but I also understand why they were fired. Maybe they wanted to get fired to make their point, but if they didn't, yelling at an executive during a meeting is always a good way to get yourself fired no matter what that executive is saying.

So while I don't want anyone building such technology either, I hope that person knew the consequences they were facing.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 73 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Getting fired is what makes this a story worth writing about. It was intentional.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

If they achieved their goal, fine. I am glad they spoke out.

[–] turkishdelight@lemmy.ml 30 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I find genocide to be worse than "breaking corporate code of conduct".

[–] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Usually engineers, while not always the most socially in tune people, aren’t total dumbasses. He also said (very publicly) that he refuses to do the work they are telling him to do so he’s explicitly telling them to fire him.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

I have exactly 1 trick to get away with letting out your righteous anger at executives: become such a visible figure in collective action that there is no way the company could ever fire you without it being illegal retaliation. The trick is to become that visible while having plausible deniability about organizing

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You don't engage in that kind of direct action without being fully aware of the consequences. An engineer at Google is not that idiotic

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You don’t engage in that kind of direct action without being fully aware of the consequences.

I would hope not, but you never know.

An engineer at Google is not that idiotic

I definitely would not go that far. https://futurism.com/blake-lemoine-google-interview

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Well, first of all, one doofus doesn't mean they are all doofus. Secondly, that person is an ethicist, not an engineer, even though Futurism calls him both, they are distinct and this guy was always making it seem like he was more than he was. Thirdly, smart people can do idiotic things, but that didn't make them idiotic, maybe if they are habitually doing idiotic things, then sure then they are idiotic, but one idiotic thing does not make an idiot, just like I've misspelling does not make someone not fluent.

Even if this one ethicist was an engineer, that doesn't mean all engineers are idiotic, that my friend would be idiotic to assert such a thing. I contend that, by and large, engineers are not idiotic. Does that mean they're aren't idiots? No, don't be silly.

Finally, I don't think that this was idiotic, so...

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (3 children)

They were probably trying to get the other engineers to follow their lead. It doesn't seem like that happened.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 39 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

"I am Spartacus!"

Everyone else: "Yeah, he's Spartacus."

[–] owen@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 months ago

🤣🤣🤣🤣 good one

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Weird assumption to make based on nothing.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

If that was their plan, they really should have found out who was with them before doing it.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I bet if they yelled something less controversial like "We want more money!" wouldn't have ended in firing. Perhaps in disciplining instead.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I doubt it. Engineers don't get to yell at executives at meetings.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Please don't disturb the overlords while they distribute kool-aid and tell you how good the kool-aid is good for you.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Do you think you could get away with something like that at your job?

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

Could I get away? It's a gamble I guess. But I've raised my voice at meetings more than once in my life and never lost my job over it.

To be fair, I've never worked in a big company like google, so they can replace you yesterday.

But if you are at that point, you are ready to lose/switch jobs.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In the US - no. In some European countries, totally. The fact I can work without being worried that I'm going to get fired because I've upset some MBA is great for my mental health.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I find it hard to believe that, even in Europe, standing up in the middle of a presentation and accusing your boss of being complicit in genocide, even if it's true, would not be a fireable offense. Otherwise there would be a lot of yelling matches.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You can get fired, but not "on the spot" and at worst, the employer has to pay your next month's paycheck. That stands even if you were fired with good cause.

So here's what would have happened, were this a Dutch company. Employee does the thing, employer says that they should leave, and they offer 1-2 months of a severance so the employee resigns on their own volition and the company avoids going to court. If the employee has more than 2 braincells, he gets a lawyer (there are good pro bono lawyers who work for free if you're not well paid enough to get one). Lawyer advises asking for 6-8 months.

Company has two choices:

  • Pay 6-8 months of severance.
  • Drag the employee into labour court, which usually leans towards employees, and try to publicly argue about whether what they are doing is legal. Obviously it's not going to about whether it's about Google committing genocide or not, but obviously the media won't care, and the words "Google" and "genocide" are going to be in the news in various combinations for a good year. All the while the company has to keep paying the employee, the most they can do is to order him to give back all equipment and prohibit him from contacting coworkers.
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Okay? No one said anything about what he gets for being fired. Only that it makes sense that he was fired.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 1 points 8 months ago

I guess the difference is that instead of being fired, you most likely get to leave on your own terms that you dictate largely. What I mean is you don't get fired, you resign, and can refer to the incident as you have resigned. If you don't want to resign, you can most likely stay in the fucked up work relationship.

I guess the main difference is not what you get, but that Google would have to argue in court that it is fine to fire the guy. And the court case comes before the firing, so if it lasts 10 years like all those cases you hear about, the guy keeps being employed.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I actually don't understand their sentiment.

This isn't the only surveillance Google is enabling. You could MAYBE argue genocide but... let's just say it isn't just facebook that supports brutal regimes.

I've worked for.... questionable companies in the past. I still argue that you more or less can't do Research without getting blood on your hands because... blood money spends well and experiments/development without a defined product is expensive.

But... unless you are a complete moron, you understand that. Don't get me wrong, there are a LOT of graduate students out there who never question WHY there are government grants and why their advisor is talking to Major Johnson and so forth (Val Kilmer's Real Genius is probably the most accurate grad school movie ever made...). But you eventually figure it out. ESPECIALLY if you are working for a company and have to have a defined/target product. I know Google/Alphabet is notorious for the cutthroat/backstabbing among employees but you aren't going to be isolated as to why you are working on a graph search algorithm or how to conceal a camera in a device.

So I don't know if this engineer was just ridiculously ignorant or if they were hoping to "go viral" or what. But you don't wake up one day and realize you are the baddies. You more or less realize that your first day of work and spend time deciding if that will lead to alcoholism or activism.