1600

John Barnett had worked for Boeing for 32 years, until his retirement in 2017.

In the days before his death, he had been giving evidence in a whistleblower lawsuit against the company.

Boeing said it was saddened to hear of Mr Barnett's passing. The Charleston County coroner confirmed his death to the BBC on Monday.

It said the 62-year-old had died from a "self-inflicted" wound on 9 March and police were investigating.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] aidan@lemmy.world 63 points 3 months ago

They do have an disincentive, its called decades in jail if its discovered you kill him.

[-] genie@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

Exactly this. In a fucked up way a rule like that would actually incentivise whistleblowers to become martyrs.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago

There should be presumption of guilt in this case.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

What?? No that's ridiculous. People do kill themselves sometimes.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago

Then they'd be interested to hire him all kinds of councilors and security guards so that he doesn't kill himself.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

What? And break into his home so he can't?

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

That'll cost them less money and years of not seeing daylight, so why not.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Because don't you think that in itself is a form of witness intimidation? Won't people be hesitant to volunteer to testify during a lengthy trial if it means a security guard literally watching them sleep and shower for months.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

I meant not that the witness would be obligated to accept that, but that a company would be interested to offer to pay for various measures to preserve their health, sanity and all that.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

But the claim was that he committed suicide, say you're concerned about the company killing you so you accept their security. Couldn't the security then just have a good reason to be in your house to "find the body" when you "slip in the shower"

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

You don't get it, his death before giving witness is unconditionally considered a murder by the company.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

So then someone else can kill him like others have said. But depending on what is being whistleblowed, someone in the company taking the fall for murder might not be as bad as what could be discovered. Especially if government agencies are included in this.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

So then someone else can kill him like others have said.

Which is why company is interested in preventing that.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

So its not really about justice for the murder?

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

Yes, it's about preventing it.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I feel like people more often die during a trial then get murdered during it.

[-] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

Step 1: Short company stocks Step 2: kill witness against the company Step 3: profit.

Just one example of that being a terrible idea

this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
1600 points (99.2% liked)

News

21742 readers
3362 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS