politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
GOOD. He SHOULD be anxious. His numbers right now in states he won, states he NEEDS TO WIN AGAIN, are awful.
Every one of his supporters needs to stop burying their head in the sand, get out, and organize.
This isn't 2020 where we could increase the vote count because Covid pushed everything to vote by mail, turn out is going to be down.
In 2020, Biden won:
Georgia (Biden +0.23%): Currently Trump +3 to +7
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/georgia/
Pennsylvania (+1.17%): Trump +4
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/pennsylvania/
Michigan (+2.78%): Trump +3 to +5
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/michigan/
Wisconsin (+0.63%): Trump +3 to +4
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/wisconsin/
Arizona (+0.3%): Trump +4 to +5
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/arizona/
Nevada (+2.39%): Trump +5 to +7
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/nevada/
In a good number of these states, even though he won, he did so by a plurality, not a majority. There is not a lot of wiggle room and if the election were today, he would lose.
I try to warn them but they just think I'm a Russian bot.
The worst ones are the ones who go "The only poll that counts is election day!"
And I'm like "Yeah, that's how you LOSE and then do a book tour about 'Whyyyyyy? Why did I looooose? It must be someone else's fauuuuulllt!"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_Happened_(Clinton_book)
Yeah, here's what happened... you shot off your mouth in West Virginia, a state you were NEVER going to win, which lost you Pennsylvania (20 electoral college votes). Then you failed to campaign AT ALL in Michigan (16) and Wisconsin (10).
Could have been 273 to 258. That's what happened.
Joe needs to show up BIG in all three of those states. There's absolutely no excuse for "Son of Scranton" to be down 4 in PA. None.
Right?
Sounds like something a Russian bot would say.
Because you don't offer any solutions. Saying "Democrats bad" does absolutely nothing to further the conversation or help steer them in the right direction. If something is dire enough to require all these "warnings" then it should be paired with actions people can take to improve the situation. It is not difficult to say "Democrats bad, Republicans are worse, here's how we fix it". If you don't feel those extra steps are necessary I would argue your concern isn't very genuine.
Protip, not talking about the problems is also not a solution. Seems you just like your silence. Half the articles posted on lemmy have no solutions presented, yet we don't find people saying things like this on those. I wonder why.
Also on the face of it its a ridiculous asertation. Should people only post articles about problems they themselves have solutions for? Because that sounds wholly stupid.
Oh I'm not saying every article/comment needs to be about solutions at all. That would be ridiculous and wholly stupid, I agree. But someone posting negative articles and comments about the Democrats all day long and acting like theyre doing it out of concern is absurd (so is the "you guys take all the positive ones so that's all that's left over" thing). It's doing nothing but creating more apathy and depressing engagement. It's a very clear pattern with obvious results so I don't see how it isn't a conscious effort.
Maybe because there’s no warning and instead it sounds like you’re repeating “Biden sucks” and “democrats suck” over and over.
Like another comment said you offer no solutions or any alternative to shitting on democrats… which isn’t going to help the issue at hand if you are to be taken seriously.