403
submitted 3 months ago by robocall@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

This month, a group of mostly Black and immigrant Uber and Lyft drivers in Minneapolis won their fight for a minimum pay rate when the Minneapolis City Council refused to be bullied by the rideshare corporations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 107 points 3 months ago

For years, Uber relied on billions of dollars from venture capitalists like BlackRock and Jeff Bezos to offer low fares for riders and high pay for drivers. This allowed the corporation to undercut competition, sign up millions of customers and corner the market in major cities.

They didn't even need to do that tbh, Taxis were (and still are) so shitty they could have just charged marginally cheaper than the going local taxi rate and people would have still flocked to them lmao

[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago

I tried taking a taxi about a year ago. There was one right there and I figured, might as well give it a try, won't have to wait. It was over twice as much as a ride share. The price difference isn't even close, they'd have to raise prices a ridiculous amount before I'd take a taxi again. Fuck not knowing how much a trip is going to cost ahead of time.

[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 29 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I've had too many bad experiences with the "cash only", "I'm not going that way".

I put my friend in a cab in London who was too drunk. I prepaid the cabbie and then he woke my friend up after he took him back and shook him down for cash.

Yeah, no thanks to cabbies.

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

I was kinda mad at Uber in 2019 (I can't remember what reason it was... They have so many reasons) and needed a ride share from the airport to a conference. The bus runs every two hours on weekends apparently, a dirty ass taxi said he can take me for $15 each, if he can get three more people. So we waited and finally got four people.

The vehicle was a mess, there was coke cans on the floor, he drove like a complete asshole, and he was incredibly rude.

Taxis were always shit before Uber. But Looks like taxis are still shit.

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

I never take rideshare from the airport anymore. It’s nearly the same cost to take a taxi, without the wait.

Their payment systems suck though. I was in one where the default tip started at 35% and was a few steps to avoid.

[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

It depends on where you are, but I've never saved money taking a taxi over ride share from the airport, but I've had it cost way more plenty of time. It being the same cost has been the best case scenario for me.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Depending on where you are, you don't have the option to take a ride share. It might have changed, but a few years ago when my wife and I flew into Orlando they had a ban on pickups from the airport.

That being said, we took a hotel shuttle and ordered the ride share from there because fuck taxis.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Even then, many taxi companies have apps now. They aren't trying to pay extra for dispatchers and stuff.

[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

I've tried those apps and they're some of the shittiest apps I've ever used

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

Curb is the only app that ever double charged me, multiple times. I had to dispute the charges with the credit card company. It took like 3-6 months to be completely done with it. They literally kept charging me every month.

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Ah yes, the taxi "Bare minimum effort" apps. Seriously, most of them look like they walked right out of the 2010 era of apps. I would say that they just asked their "techy teen nephew that knows apps" to make it, but that would be an insult to techy teen nephews everywhere.

I tried an app last year just to see how things are, the book a cab button just opened my fucking dialer with a pre filled number. In 2023.

The best cab app I ever saw still looked like 2016 (but better than the others stuck in 2009-2010 I'll give them that) but that one would only give me an "estimated ride range" like fuck that. One of the best pros to a ride share app is that the price it tells you in app is the price you're getting charged (excluded driver tip) leaving very little room for the driver to introduce shenanigans, like the classic cabbie trick of "oh this guys definitely isn't local so I'll take the LONG way around"

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

That's hilarious. Yeah they can do better.

[-] TheControlled@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago
[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

This particular cab was in Sweden

[-] TheControlled@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I only ask because where I live (Silicon Valley) taxis have become very competitive with rideshare. I doubt it's true all the time, but I've had great prices leaving concerts in San Francisco.

Also! scheduling an Uber for pickup is absurdly expensive. I called a cab compay and they were a quarter of the price. Pro tip?

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

The taxis here are half the price of a ride share. Most large city taxi companies have an app now that will give you the price of the trip.

[-] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

True. But they did that. Anyway. That is technically Anti-Trust. Thus in essense illegal. That is why uber tried shilling that they are not an employer but merely a service as to seem that they were skimming the Law that they knew they were breaking in Spirit. They aren't stupid. But know many are, so why not exploit them? If we are smart, they thought, they could drive Taxis out of business, be the big dog in the sector and surge price their way into profit. At will. It is not like this type of shit has not been attempted before.

Also, Uber simply transfered the costs of running its fleets, upkeep, maintenance, including most liability and litigation to its drivers. Not to mention that love it or hate it Taxi drivers need to pass some basic level of proficiency, for uber you could be a blatant rapist and as long as you can click on a form for 5 minutes, you are good to go.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago

They do actually do a background check. Whether it works or not is another question, but I think it works pretty well at keeping out most crazies. Plus the customer reviews and GPS monitoring work decently for keeping drivers on their best behavior.

Those are not present in taxis, and there's very little recourse against a creepy taxi driver. Some cities make Uber drivers get the same license as a taxi driver.

[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

Well no they couldn’t. Uber is far less efficient and more expensive to run than a taxi company. They need the extra cash.

this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
403 points (98.1% liked)

News

21721 readers
4944 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS