this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
540 points (97.4% liked)

World News

32048 readers
493 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RampageDon@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

Doesn't it take only 1 of the counties with veto power to shut this down? Why would Russia ever approve?

Edit: Had a brain fart. Thanks for the corrections. Leaving my dumb comment anyway.

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 79 points 5 months ago (2 children)

NATO. Not the UN. Russia has no say into nato since it was designed to fit Russia.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 32 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

designed to fit Russia.

Luckily Russia isn't fit.

[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Down voted for a joke based on someone else's typo... what a world we live in

Edit: that's more like it

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

I'm doing my part!

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 15 points 5 months ago

Never ask a man their wage, never ask a woman their age, never ask who started NATO and why.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Russia isn't in NATO, but they are it's most successful recruiter.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Which is why I'm baffled why people still spread the myth that Russia invaded to 'stop nato aggression.'

Like, firstly you're fucking wrong, but if you want to wear that L like a medal then go for it. Russia is the biggest reason the baltics joined.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 6 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I'm not sure who would say that it was to 'stop NATO aggression', but it's not hard to imagine it as a some kind of response to NATO's continued expansion around them.

NATO hasn't been in any direct operations against Russia but they have been involved in the ME where they have been active.

I think of it a lot in the same way as the US's pacific ocean and Caribbean territorial expansion and involvement in central america as a response to the Cuban Missile crisis and Soviet posturing.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think of it a lot in the same way as the US’s pacific ocean and Caribbean territorial expansion and involvement in central america as a response to the Cuban Missile crisis and Soviet posturing.

The "Cuban" missile crisis was started by USA putting nukes in Turkey.

[–] Thief_of_Crows@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Wasnt the US involved in SA long before the CMC?

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago

Well yea, the US has had imperial ambitions since its founding, but they definitely doubled down when their primary adversary set up camp in their backyard

[–] gun@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Russia is the biggest reason the baltics joined.

The Baltic states joined in 2004. Long before Putin was made into a pariah, and Russia was still seen as part of the West and publicly aspiring to join NATO

[–] jackpot@lemmy.ml -3 points 5 months ago

russia, seen as part of the west? what the hell.

[–] Blursty@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 5 months ago

NATO lost. They stopped the aggression. You're going to have to dea with that. NATO is finished now, along with the rest of the west.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Because that's what Russia has been repeating for the past two years. Some people believe lies whan they're repeated often enough.

A major reason may have been to stop Ukraine's entry in Nato though.

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I am very confused by your comment. Are you saying Putin never said that, or are you saying he was lying?

From Putin's actual mouth:

ON DECISION TO LAUNCH 'SPECIAL MILITARY OPERATION'

"We saw military infrastructure being ramped up, hundreds of military advisers working and regular deliveries of modern weapons from NATO. (The level of) danger was increasing every day. Russia preventively rebuffed the aggressor. It was necessary, timely and ... right. The decision of a sovereign, strong, independent country."

Just to be clear, he definitely said that, but he was definitely lying.

(source: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/putin-speaks-victory-day-parade-moscows-red-square-2022-05-09/)

[–] Saff@lemmy.ml 23 points 5 months ago

NATO not the UN, Russia isn’t a member.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Who gave Russia a veto at NATO?

[–] MrEff@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] force@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Erdoğan would if he could