646
submitted 2 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Brazil, Germany, Spain and South Africa sign motion for fairer tax system to deliver £250bn a year extra to fight poverty and climate crisis

The world’s 3,000 billionaires should pay a minimum 2% tax on their fast-growing wealth to raise £250bn a year for the global fight against poverty, inequality and global heating, ministers from four leading economies have suggested.

In a sign of growing international support for a levy on the super-rich, Brazil, Germany, South Africa and Spain say a 2% tax would reduce inequality and raise much-needed public funds after the economic shocks of the pandemic, the climate crisis and military conflicts in Europe and the Middle East.

They are calling for more countries to join their campaign, saying the annual sum raised would be enough to cover the estimated cost of damage caused by all of last year’s extreme weather events.

“It is time that the international community gets serious about tackling inequality and financing global public goods,” the ministers say in a Guardian comment piece.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SteefLem@lemmy.world 40 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

2% what the…. My income above 50k is taxed 48% i think. Wtf 2%

Edit: yes i know the difference, but still…

[-] Damage@feddit.it 27 points 2 months ago

Wealth tax is different from income tax. Once you've received your income it becomes wealth, and it is not taxed unless you use it. Wealth tax would mean that your money in the bank is taxed periodically.

[-] nac82@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Which is clearly necessary, and companies know it.

Open any MMO built and organized around a player economy (designed by a for-profit corporation) and you will see they know that individual wealth can upset the balance of the game.

They set maximum currency values, or they charge you periodic taxes for existing in the server.

When people are being honest about wealth, we all know the concentration of wealth in the extreme fucks up the system for everybody.

And video game systems do not even have a scarcity problem like the real world.

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

That’s your income not your net worth, 2% of your net worth would be taking the value of all your cash + stocks/investments/businesses + assets like cars/homes/land/collectibles/jewelry/etc and taxing 2% of that value.

Your income shouldn’t be your net worth unless you’re honestly spending every dime of every check

[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 months ago

A lot of us are poor enough where we sorta have to just to survive.

[-] Good_morning@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 months ago

Right? Who can afford to own things?

[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I’m in that club. Woohoooo!

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

So what about people paying more in taxes than their net worth is?

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Not super relevant to the convo, everyone pays taxes based on income, the proposal is to make rich people ALSO pay on net worth, not all people. For most people the effort of doing a net worth assessment isn’t worth the tax income

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah I know, IMO hoarding wealth is just bad for the system we agree on (using paper slips and numbers in computers to exchange goods and services). It just gives power to the few, without the possibility to overturn them as we might in an election.

[-] orrk@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

ah, but imagine if you have 128Billion dollars, more than the GDP of many countries

this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
646 points (98.1% liked)

World News

37319 readers
2396 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS