this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
1100 points (98.6% liked)

Science Memes

11068 readers
2722 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kadu@lemmy.world 38 points 6 months ago (3 children)

This title is also misleading, though. By claiming "evolution isn't linear" and then showing a massive dinosaur leading to a chicken, you're suggesting the chicken is a downgrade (otherwise, what "linear" would even mean in this context?).

The chicken is, however, a massive upgrade - for the specific environment it lived in. Well, "proto-chickens", let's say. The actual domesticated chicken is the result of artificial selection.

[–] Glowstick@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

The title and the meme are correct. Many people think that evolution means a line of becoming bigger and physically stronger and having more powerful offensive capabilities and smarter and faster etc. But in reality evolution can just as easily mean becoming smaller, weaker, dumber, and slower

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

Hey evolution has decided at least one person I know is gonna become the start of a line of Neo-Neanderthals. So we aint all doomed.

[–] kadu@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The issue is precisely in your mix up of "linear progression" and implying "smaller" is somehow a counter argument to that. While it's true evolution isn't linear, being smaller is not a downgrade at all.

[–] Glowstick@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I haven't mixed up anything. Smaller to bigger to smaller again is not a linear progression in size going always upward, which is what happens in games and in people's misconceptions.

[–] cloudless@lemmy.cafe 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What you said isn't an "upgrade" either. It is just adapting to the changes.

[–] kadu@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

It is just adapting to the changes.

Increasing fitness in one's environment is an upgrade. Being smaller or bigger, by itself, is not an upgrade nor a downgrade, it depends on context.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Well, "proto-chickens", let's say.

Also known as red junglefowl.