this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
1126 points (98.6% liked)

Work Reform

10032 readers
365 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Earlier in the pandemic many news and magazine organizations would proudly write about how working from home always actually can lead to over working and being too "productive". I am yet to collect some evidence on it but I think we remember a good amount about this.

Now after a bunch of companies want their remote workers back at the office, every one of those companies are being almost propaganda machines which do not cite sound scientific studies but cite each other and interviews with higher ups in top companies that "remote workers are less productive". This is further cementing the general public's opinion on this matter.

And research that shows the opposite is buried deep within any search results.

Have you noticed this? Please share what you have observed. I'm going paranoid about this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarkMessiah@lemmy.world 287 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yup, corporations need to justify owning the big-ass office buildings they bought out, so they’re paying to make their own opinions be reported on over the actual truth. As usual.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 137 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's not just the corporations renting those offices, it's the politicians of downtown areas that fear a downturn in tax revenue due to more empty offices and less people getting their daily coffee/lunch/after work drinks.

And of course, if everyone's working remotely, this means it's a lot easier to find a better job without even needing to leave the house to interview, which gives employees a better bargaining position (downside is that employers will start looking at employees in lower paying countries as well).

[–] Sharpiemarker@feddit.de 39 points 1 year ago

downside is that employers will start looking at employees in lower paying countries as well).

Tale as old as time

[–] lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the commercial mortgage backed securities market.

Remember 2008 when they bundled up all those home mortgages that were based on shitty unpayable loans and sold off securities to retirement funds etc? But then people couldn't pay and the entire economy imploded resulting in massive bank failures?

Same deal. All those office space loans have been collateralized into securities. The 1% and the banking industry understand perfectly that if they don't force people to return to office, the entire system will implode again. Even after Dodd Frank the regulations on over the counter derivatives are still mostly non existent.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder why they bother, considering they'll probably get bailed out again anyway.

There's always money in the banana stand

[–] Billy_Gnosis@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

All of this is happening with my company as we speak. I actually did a remote interview today while on my lunch hour. And my current company has just rolled out plans for "clerical help" based out of India. I'm in the U.S.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I find it real fascinating how many people are blindsided by the fact that the people who own things that focus on making a profit skew the information they put out to benefit themselves. Did they think they were impartial or something? I mean they claim their neutral they don't ever show that they're neutral.

[–] gornar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

And the proven financial benefit of having people work from home must not be as profitable as corporate real estate, or companies wouldn't be requiring in-office work again!