this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
1251 points (98.5% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5480 readers
1404 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] suction@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But it has to be done by experts who have full knowledge of the consensus. Not some backwater racist builder from Flyover, USA.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It doesn't have to be done by experts.

All it needs is an individual who can keep to the scientific method, which some rednecks can do.

It is just that most people don't understand it, so their method of researching is flawed and will come to flawed conclusions. It is why we have Flat Earthers

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Overall I agree, hate the term “redneck” though. Nothing wrong with working that kind of job, always thought it was a classist term

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Doesn't even have to be proper scientific method. People see patterns; patterns are science. A layman can spot something that was missed by experts: it happens sometimes.

Now, you don't want to trust that layman's findings against an expert, without proper investigation, preferably by those same experts! Step one is finding something; step two is verifying it in a way that other people can trust.